• DocumentCode
    1903714
  • Title

    Comparison between Range-Difference-based and Bistatic-Range-based localization in multistatic passive radar

  • Author

    Noroozi, Ali ; Sebt, Mohammad Ali

  • Author_Institution
    Dept. of Electr. Eng., K.N. Toosi Univ. of Technol., Tehran, Iran
  • fYear
    2015
  • fDate
    24-26 June 2015
  • Firstpage
    1058
  • Lastpage
    1063
  • Abstract
    Two least square techniques, Bistatic-Range-based (BR-based) method and Range-Difference-based (RD-based) method, are presented to find the location of a target in multistatic passive radar. Also, the Cramer-Rao lower bound (CRLB) of the location estimates is obtained for both of them in this issue. For these two presented techniques, we see that the performance of the BR-based technique is quite better than the RD-based technique in the simulation results. For this reason, using the BR-based technique in multistatic passive radar is recommended. Furthermore, the BR-based method required one less receiver than the RD-based method for finding the target position uniquely. The simulation results also show that the placement is important to decrease the error of target position estimation.
  • Keywords
    RSSI; direction-of-arrival estimation; estimation theory; passive radar; regression analysis; BR-based method; CRLB; Cramer-Rao lower bound; RD-based method; bistatic-range-based localization; decrease target position estimation error; least square techniques; multistatic passive radar; range-difference-based localization; Estimation; Euclidean distance; Mathematical model; Passive radar; Receivers; Simulation; Transmitters;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Radar Symposium (IRS), 2015 16th International
  • Conference_Location
    Dresden
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/IRS.2015.7226218
  • Filename
    7226218