• DocumentCode
    1922416
  • Title

    The comparison of pixel size and atmospheric correction method on matched filter detection for a hyperspectral image

  • Author

    Conforti, P.F. ; Sundberg, R.L.

  • Author_Institution
    Spectral Sci., Inc., Burlington, MA, USA
  • fYear
    2009
  • fDate
    26-28 Aug. 2009
  • Firstpage
    1
  • Lastpage
    4
  • Abstract
    Two atmospheric correction methods are used to obtain the reflectance for a hyperspectral data image resampled to varying spatial resolution. The physics-based FLAASH approach as well as the in-scene based QUAC method retrieve the reflectance spectra for the scene, and the ability to use the results to detect materials of interest in the image is determined. Using a spectral matched filter to score the results, both FLAASH and QUAC perform well at matching the ground truth spectrum of a bright meter-sized material at ground sampling distances of 2.4-24 m. For a dark material, QUAC performance degrades with lower resolutions.
  • Keywords
    geophysical signal processing; image resolution; matched filters; optical filters; atmospheric correction method; bright meter-sized material; ground sampling distances; hyperspectral data image; matched filter detection; pixel size; reflectance spectra; spectral matched filter; Equations; Hyperspectral imaging; Hyperspectral sensors; Image retrieval; Image sampling; Layout; Matched filters; Pixel; Reflectivity; Spatial resolution; FLAASH; MODTRAN4; QUAC; atmospheric; compensation; correction; hyperspectral; multispectral;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Hyperspectral Image and Signal Processing: Evolution in Remote Sensing, 2009. WHISPERS '09. First Workshop on
  • Conference_Location
    Grenoble
  • Print_ISBN
    978-1-4244-4686-5
  • Electronic_ISBN
    978-1-4244-4687-2
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/WHISPERS.2009.5289000
  • Filename
    5289000