• DocumentCode
    1963769
  • Title

    A comparison of electrical performance between a wire bonded and a flip chip CSP package

  • Author

    Pan, S.J. ; Kapoor, R. ; Sun, Anthony Y S ; Wang, C.K. ; Low, H.G.

  • Author_Institution
    Adv. Package & Technol. Center, United Test & Assembly Center Ltd., Singapore, Singapore
  • fYear
    2003
  • fDate
    16-18 July 2003
  • Firstpage
    125
  • Lastpage
    130
  • Abstract
    In this paper, electrical simulations are performed to characterize a wire-bonded window CSP (wCSPTM) package and a flip chip CSP (fcCSP) package designed for the same die. Results indicate that fcCSP has a slightly wider bandwidth than window CSP. Although, window CSP has a larger parasitic resistance and inductance for the target nets, it has a lower crosstalk in terms of peak-peak voltage due to shorter parallel traces. An optimized flip chip design is proposed and the results show a vast improvement over the wire bonded CSP package. Parametric studies are also performed to investigate the effects of bond wires with different diameter and horizontal distance, and variations in signal traces. These results provide useful insights on design and process selection for high-performance semiconductor packages.
  • Keywords
    chip scale packaging; flip-chip devices; lead bonding; semiconductor device packaging; bond wires; electrical performance; electrical simulation; flip chip CSP package; flip chip design; horizontal distance; inductance; larger parasitic resistance; optimisation; peak-peak voltage; semiconductor packages; shorter parallel traces; signal traces; window CSP; wire bonded CSP package; Bandwidth; Bonding; Chip scale packaging; Crosstalk; Electric resistance; Flip chip; Inductance; Semiconductor device packaging; Voltage; Wire;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Electronics Manufacturing Technology Symposium, 2003. IEMT 2003. IEEE/CPMT/SEMI 28th International
  • ISSN
    1089-8190
  • Print_ISBN
    0-7803-7933-0
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/IEMT.2003.1225888
  • Filename
    1225888