• DocumentCode
    1966641
  • Title

    Modular & benchtop instrument convergence decreases test costs and increases productivity

  • Author

    Morris, Mark W. ; Shaw, Boyd L. ; Ziomek, Christopher D.

  • Author_Institution
    ZTEC Instrum., Albuquerque
  • fYear
    2007
  • fDate
    17-20 Sept. 2007
  • Firstpage
    284
  • Lastpage
    290
  • Abstract
    The convergence of functionality between modular (e.g. VXI, PCI, PXI, LXI) and benchtop (conventional rack and stack) test and measurement instruments leads to decreased test costs and increased productivity for end users and their companies. Compared to benchtop instruments, the strengths of modular instruments are lower prices, easier system integration, and smaller footprints. In the past, however, most modular instruments have not provided the robust feature set and advanced analysis capabilities commonly found in benchtop instruments. Modular instrument usage is more widespread today as they become easier to use and offer many of the same advanced functions and features traditionally found in benchtop instruments. One key benefit of the modular/benchtop convergence is the emergence of "enterprise" instrumentation, where the same model of modular instrument hardware can be used in the design, validation, test, and even service sections of a company. It is possible to reconfigure soft front panel (SFP) applications to meet the needs of multiple users who may have dramatically different needs. For example, a design engineer may need an oscilloscope with historical memory to help with troubleshooting and may also need the ability to customize math waveform calculations. A validation engineer, not needing the advanced features required by the design engineer, might prefer a simplified user interface for basic testing. Likewise, a test engineer may only require a user interface for mask testing for simplified pass/fail determination. The ability of engineers or technicians in different sections of the company to use the same enterprise instrument results in decreased costs and increased productivity. Examples of cost savings include: decreased calibration and service costs; decreased training costs; and possibly quantity discounts from instrument vendors. An example of increased productivity is the use of consistent measurement algorithms at each stage in the design,- validate, test, and service process, providing repeatable results.
  • Keywords
    automatic testing; computerised instrumentation; user interfaces; benchtop instruments; enterprise instrumentation; modular instruments; reconfigure soft front panel; test costs; user interface; Companies; Convergence; Costs; Design engineering; Hardware; Instruments; Productivity; Robustness; Testing; User interfaces;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Autotestcon, 2007 IEEE
  • Conference_Location
    Baltimore, MD
  • ISSN
    1088-7725
  • Print_ISBN
    978-1-4244-1239-6
  • Electronic_ISBN
    1088-7725
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/AUTEST.2007.4374231
  • Filename
    4374231