• DocumentCode
    1992874
  • Title

    ROC-ConCert: ROC-Based Measurement of Consistency and Certainty

  • Author

    Powers, David M W

  • Author_Institution
    CSEM Centre for Knowledge & Interaction Technol., Flinders Univ., Adelaide, SA, Australia
  • fYear
    2012
  • fDate
    27-30 May 2012
  • Firstpage
    1
  • Lastpage
    4
  • Abstract
    Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) has increasingly been advocated as a mechanism for evaluating classifiers, particularly when the precise conditions and costs of deployment are not known. Area Under the Curve (AUC) is then used a single figure for comparing how good too methods or algorithms are. Additional support for ROC AUC is cited in its equivalence to the non-parametric Wilcoxon signed rank test, but we show that this is in general misleading and that use of AUC implicitly makes theoretical assumptions that are not well met in practice. This paper advocates two ROC-related measures that separate out two specific types of goodness that are wrapped up in ROC-AUC, which we call Consistency (Con) and Certainty (Cert). We treat primarily the dichotomous 2 class case, but discuss also the generalization to multiple classes.
  • Keywords
    learning (artificial intelligence); nonparametric statistics; pattern classification; sensitivity analysis; ROC AUC; ROC-ConCert; ROC-based measurement; ROC-related measures; area under the curve; certainty; classifier evaluation; consistency; machine learning; nonparametric Wilcoxon signed rank test; receiver operating characteristics; Accuracy; Decision trees; Learning systems; Machine learning; Mutual information; Receivers; Tuning;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Engineering and Technology (S-CET), 2012 Spring Congress on
  • Conference_Location
    Xian
  • Print_ISBN
    978-1-4577-1965-3
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/SCET.2012.6342144
  • Filename
    6342144