DocumentCode :
2022325
Title :
A comparison of distribution network planning solutions: Traditional reinforcement versus integration of distributed energy storage
Author :
Celli, G. ; Pilo, F. ; Soma, G.G. ; Cicoria, Rocco ; Mauri, G. ; Fasciolo, Enrico ; Fogliata, Gianfranco
Author_Institution :
Univ. of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
fYear :
2013
fDate :
16-20 June 2013
Firstpage :
1
Lastpage :
6
Abstract :
Despite the radical changes that the electricity distribution system is currently facing and will have to face in the next decade, utilities still adopt a traditional approach for the expansion planning of their networks, based essentially on the fit and forget concept (only network reinforcements to cope with the worst case scenario). Although innovative solutions have been proposed in the last decade at the electricity distribution level (distributed energy storage, active management of distributed generation, demand side integration, etc.) and are becoming technically and economically feasible, they are not yet considered as viable planning alternatives. The reasons of this reluctance are the lack of ad hoc planning tools and business cases. In the paper, a novel planning tool for Active Distribution Networks is applied to a real MV distribution network of the A2A utility sited in the district of Brescia in order to prove the benefit of energy storage devices.
Keywords :
distributed power generation; power distribution planning; Brescia district; MV distribution network; active distribution networks; distributed energy storage; distribution network planning solutions; energy storage devices; Discharges (electric); Electricity; Energy storage; Investment; Planning; Substations; Active Distribution Network; Distributed Energy Storage; Distribution Network Planning;
fLanguage :
English
Publisher :
ieee
Conference_Titel :
PowerTech (POWERTECH), 2013 IEEE Grenoble
Conference_Location :
Grenoble
Type :
conf
DOI :
10.1109/PTC.2013.6652338
Filename :
6652338
Link To Document :
بازگشت