• DocumentCode
    2036038
  • Title

    Clarity for Stakeholders: Empirical Evaluation of ScenarioML, Use Cases, and Sequence Diagrams

  • Author

    Alspaugh, Thomas A. ; Sim, S.E. ; Winbladh, Kristina ; Leila, M.H.D. ; Naslavsky ; Ziv, H. ; Richardson, D.J.

  • Author_Institution
    Dept. of Inf. Bren Sch. of Inf. & Comput. Sci., Univ. of California, Irvine, CA
  • fYear
    2007
  • fDate
    16-16 Oct. 2007
  • Firstpage
    1
  • Lastpage
    10
  • Abstract
    We studied the clarity of three requirements forms, operationalized as ease of problem detection, freedom from obstructions to understanding, and understandability by a variety of stakeholders. A set of use cases for an industrial system was translated into ScenarioML scenarios and into sequence diagrams; problems identified during each translation were noted; and all three forms were presented to a range of system stakeholders, who were nterviewed before and after performing tasks using the forms. The data was analyzed, and convergent results were triangulated across data sources and methods. The data indicated that ScenarioML scenarios best support requirements clarity, then sequence diagrams but only for stakeholders experienced with them, and finally use cases as the least clear form.
  • Keywords
    data analysis; formal specification; ScenarioML; data analysis; industrial system; sequence diagrams; Cables; Data analysis; Humans; Informatics; Materials testing; Medical services; Middleware; Performance analysis; Prototypes; Telephony;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Comparative Evaluation in Requirements Engineering, 2007. CERE '07. Fifth International Workshop on
  • Conference_Location
    New Delhi
  • Print_ISBN
    978-0-7695-3378-0
  • Electronic_ISBN
    978-0-7695-3378-0
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/CERE.2007.3
  • Filename
    4557814