DocumentCode
2036038
Title
Clarity for Stakeholders: Empirical Evaluation of ScenarioML, Use Cases, and Sequence Diagrams
Author
Alspaugh, Thomas A. ; Sim, S.E. ; Winbladh, Kristina ; Leila, M.H.D. ; Naslavsky ; Ziv, H. ; Richardson, D.J.
Author_Institution
Dept. of Inf. Bren Sch. of Inf. & Comput. Sci., Univ. of California, Irvine, CA
fYear
2007
fDate
16-16 Oct. 2007
Firstpage
1
Lastpage
10
Abstract
We studied the clarity of three requirements forms, operationalized as ease of problem detection, freedom from obstructions to understanding, and understandability by a variety of stakeholders. A set of use cases for an industrial system was translated into ScenarioML scenarios and into sequence diagrams; problems identified during each translation were noted; and all three forms were presented to a range of system stakeholders, who were nterviewed before and after performing tasks using the forms. The data was analyzed, and convergent results were triangulated across data sources and methods. The data indicated that ScenarioML scenarios best support requirements clarity, then sequence diagrams but only for stakeholders experienced with them, and finally use cases as the least clear form.
Keywords
data analysis; formal specification; ScenarioML; data analysis; industrial system; sequence diagrams; Cables; Data analysis; Humans; Informatics; Materials testing; Medical services; Middleware; Performance analysis; Prototypes; Telephony;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Comparative Evaluation in Requirements Engineering, 2007. CERE '07. Fifth International Workshop on
Conference_Location
New Delhi
Print_ISBN
978-0-7695-3378-0
Electronic_ISBN
978-0-7695-3378-0
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/CERE.2007.3
Filename
4557814
Link To Document