• DocumentCode
    2042623
  • Title

    Comparison of robustness between adaptive control and PID control

  • Author

    Shibata, H. ; Mitsukawa, N.

  • Author_Institution
    Dept. of Electron., Osaka Prefectural Univ., Sakai, Japan
  • Volume
    4
  • fYear
    1993
  • fDate
    19-21 Oct. 1993
  • Firstpage
    34
  • Abstract
    This paper quantitatively compares adaptive control schemes with PID control scheme from the robustness point of view for parameter variation of a controlled system. The adaptive schemes are model reference adaptive control (MRAC) and adaptive pole placement control (APPC). All the controllers are of discrete-time with and without saturation limit in the control input. The transfer function of the controlled system is taken to be K/[s(1+sT/sub c/)]. It is shown that the adaptive has extremely wider stable range for parameters of K and T/sub c/ than the PID. Adaptive control gives shorter settling time than PID control when the parameters of controlled system varies apart considerably from their nominal values. Moreover, adequate sampling period exists in the adaptive schemes when the control input is limited.<>
  • Keywords
    adaptive control; control system analysis; model reference adaptive control systems; pole assignment; stability; three-term control; transfer functions; PID control; adaptive control; adaptive pole placement control; model reference adaptive control; parameter variation; robustness; sampling period; transfer function; Adaptive control; Adaptive systems; Awards Planning & Policy Committee; Control systems; Programmable control; Robust control; Sampling methods; State feedback; Three-term control; Transfer functions;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    TENCON '93. Proceedings. Computer, Communication, Control and Power Engineering.1993 IEEE Region 10 Conference on
  • Conference_Location
    Beijing, China
  • Print_ISBN
    0-7803-1233-3
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/TENCON.1993.320428
  • Filename
    320428