DocumentCode :
2069409
Title :
Case study of product defects found by air discharge mode ESD but missed by contact ESD
Author :
Soohoo, Kwok ; Wielgos, Michael
Author_Institution :
IBM Corp., Poughkeepsie, NY
fYear :
2008
fDate :
19-23 May 2008
Firstpage :
136
Lastpage :
139
Abstract :
Product ESD immunity testing to meet European EMC Directive called for air discharge and contact mode ESD tests; however when testing product with exposed metal areas then contact mode is the specified method. In this paper 2 cases are documented to demonstrate that air discharge mode used exclusively on product with plastic or insulated covers/chassis should not be taken a backseat to contact ESD for exposed metal areas. In fact both methods should be used to complement each other when testing products.
Keywords :
electromagnetic interference; electrostatic discharge; failure analysis; immunity testing; ESD immunity testing; air discharge mode ESD; contact ESD; Connectors; Electromagnetic compatibility; Electrostatic discharge; Gaskets; IEC standards; Immunity testing; Impedance; Logic; Surface discharges; System testing;
fLanguage :
English
Publisher :
ieee
Conference_Titel :
Electromagnetic Compatibility and 19th International Zurich Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility, 2008. APEMC 2008. Asia-Pacific Symposium on
Conference_Location :
Singapore
Print_ISBN :
978-981-08-0629-3
Electronic_ISBN :
978-981-08-0629-3
Type :
conf
DOI :
10.1109/APEMC.2008.4559830
Filename :
4559830
Link To Document :
بازگشت