Title : 
Uniting model-based and model-free methods for robotic manipulator direction control
         
        
            Author : 
Bowers, Henry M., III ; Cook, Gerald
         
        
            Author_Institution : 
Customer Technol. Services, Fannie Mae, Washington, DC, USA
         
        
        
        
            fDate : 
31 Aug-4 Sep 1998
         
        
        
            Abstract : 
Model-based and model-free control methods each have associated strengths and weaknesses, This paper discusses the positive effect in performance obtained by uniting the two approaches within a hybrid controller. In the domain of robotic manipulator direction control, the authors describe and compare: (a) the performance of resolved motion rate control, a well-known model-based control method; with (b) the performance of machine nervous systems for motor control, a novel model-free control method; and (c) the performance of a hybrid control scheme which incorporates the functionality of the other two methods. Their results show that the hybrid control possesses all the strengths of its constituent methods and none of their weaknesses
         
        
            Keywords : 
control system analysis; control system synthesis; electric motors; machine control; machine theory; manipulators; motion control; neurocontrollers; control design; control simulation; hybrid controller; machine nervous systems; model-based control methods; model-free control methods; motor control; resolved motion rate control performance; robotic manipulator direction control; DH-HEMTs; Equations; Kinematics; Manipulator dynamics; Motion control; Motor drives; Nervous system; Robot control; Solid modeling; Transforms;
         
        
        
        
            Conference_Titel : 
Industrial Electronics Society, 1998. IECON '98. Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference of the IEEE
         
        
            Conference_Location : 
Aachen
         
        
            Print_ISBN : 
0-7803-4503-7
         
        
        
            DOI : 
10.1109/IECON.1998.724250