• DocumentCode
    2078154
  • Title

    Transformation of the Mason-Likar 12-lead electrocardiogram to the Frank vectorcardiogram

  • Author

    Guldenring, D. ; Finlay, D.D. ; Strauss, David G. ; Galeotti, Loriano ; Nugent, Chris D. ; Donnelly, Mark P. ; Bond, R.R.

  • Author_Institution
    Comput. Sci. Res. Inst. & the Sch. of Comput. & Math., Univ. of Ulster, Newtownabbey, Jordan
  • fYear
    2012
  • fDate
    Aug. 28 2012-Sept. 1 2012
  • Firstpage
    677
  • Lastpage
    680
  • Abstract
    Vectorcardiograpic (VCG) parameters can supplement the diagnostic information of the 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG). Nevertheless, the VCG is seldom recorded in modern-day practice. A common approach today is to derive the Frank VCG from the standard 12-lead ECG (distal limb electrode positions). There is, to date no direct method that allows for a transformation from 12-lead ECGs with proximal limb electrode positions (Mason-Likar (ML) 12-lead ECG), to Frank VCGs. In this research, we develop such a transformation (ML2VCG) by means of multivariate linear regression on a training data set of 545 ML 12-lead ECGs and corresponding Frank VCGs that were both extracted surface potential maps (BSPMs). We compare the performance of the ML2VCG method against an alternative approach (2step method) that utilizes two existing transformations that are applied consecutively (ML 12-lead ECG to standard 12-lead ECG and subsequently to Frank VCG). We quantify the performance of ML2VCG and 2 step on an unseen test dataset (181 ML 12-lead ECGs and corresponding Frank VCGs again extracted from BSPMs) through root mean squared error (RMSE) values, calculated over the QRST, between actual and transformed Frank leads. The ML2VCG transformation achieved a reduction of the median RMSE values for leads X (13.9μV; p<;.001), Y (15.1μV; p<;.001) and Z (2.6μV; p=.001) when compared to the 2 step transformation. Our results show that the 2step method may not be optimal when transforming ML 12-lead ECGs to Frank VCGs. The utilization of the herein developed ML2VCG transformation should thus be considered when transforming ML 12-lead ECGs to Frank VCGs.
  • Keywords
    bioelectric potentials; biomedical electrodes; electrocardiography; mean square error methods; regression analysis; surface potential; Frank VCG; Frank vectorcardiogram; ML 12-lead ECG; ML2VCG method; ML2VCG transformation; Mason-Likar 12-lead electrocardiogram; QRST; diagnostic information; distal limb electrode position; median RMSE values; multivariate linear regression; proximal limb electrode positions; root mean squared error values; standard 12-lead ECG; surface potential maps; test dataset; training data set; vectorcardiograpic parameters; Electric potential; Electrocardiography; Electrodes; Heart; Interpolation; Standards; Vectors; Body Surface Potential Mapping; Databases, Factual; Electrocardiography; Electrodes; Humans; Hypertrophy, Left Ventricular; Linear Models; Models, Statistical; Multivariate Analysis; Myocardial Infarction; Reference Values; Vectorcardiography;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE
  • Conference_Location
    San Diego, CA
  • ISSN
    1557-170X
  • Print_ISBN
    978-1-4244-4119-8
  • Electronic_ISBN
    1557-170X
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/EMBC.2012.6346022
  • Filename
    6346022