DocumentCode :
2090713
Title :
Common AMHS myths [automated material handling systems]
Author :
Wright, D. Rex ; Riley, Norma
Author_Institution :
Asyst Technol. Inc., Fremont, CA, USA
fYear :
2005
fDate :
13-15 Sept. 2005
Firstpage :
277
Lastpage :
280
Abstract :
The goal of an automation system is to enable predictable flow of work in progress (WIP) using the smallest buffering practical, as a way of minimizing inventory (and thus cycle time per Little\´s Law [Wallace J. Hopp et al., 2000]) while maintaining a defined (measurable) and acceptable amount of risk to production throughput (capital return). Often, the automated material handling system (AHMS) is evaluated on transport metrics like point-to-point delivery times and cost per storage shelf. However, from a capital-intensive factory\´s point of view, more critical metrics involve process tool utilization and overall throughput. By looking at the problem from the process tool\´s point-of-view, one can avoid certain common "myths" about the AMHS that might lead to additional costs without benefit to the factory\´s productivity.
Keywords :
cost reduction; goods distribution; inventory management; materials handling; productivity; risk management; work in progress; automated material handling system; buffering; capital return; capital-intensive factory; cost per storage shelf; factory productivity; inventory minimization; point-to-point delivery times; process tool utilization; transport metrics; work-in-progress; Automation; Buffer storage; Flow production systems; Fluid flow measurement; Material storage; Materials handling; Production facilities; Springs; Throughput; Time measurement;
fLanguage :
English
Publisher :
ieee
Conference_Titel :
Semiconductor Manufacturing, 2005. ISSM 2005, IEEE International Symposium on
Print_ISBN :
0-7803-9143-8
Type :
conf
DOI :
10.1109/ISSM.2005.1513356
Filename :
1513356
Link To Document :
بازگشت