• DocumentCode
    2090713
  • Title

    Common AMHS myths [automated material handling systems]

  • Author

    Wright, D. Rex ; Riley, Norma

  • Author_Institution
    Asyst Technol. Inc., Fremont, CA, USA
  • fYear
    2005
  • fDate
    13-15 Sept. 2005
  • Firstpage
    277
  • Lastpage
    280
  • Abstract
    The goal of an automation system is to enable predictable flow of work in progress (WIP) using the smallest buffering practical, as a way of minimizing inventory (and thus cycle time per Little\´s Law [Wallace J. Hopp et al., 2000]) while maintaining a defined (measurable) and acceptable amount of risk to production throughput (capital return). Often, the automated material handling system (AHMS) is evaluated on transport metrics like point-to-point delivery times and cost per storage shelf. However, from a capital-intensive factory\´s point of view, more critical metrics involve process tool utilization and overall throughput. By looking at the problem from the process tool\´s point-of-view, one can avoid certain common "myths" about the AMHS that might lead to additional costs without benefit to the factory\´s productivity.
  • Keywords
    cost reduction; goods distribution; inventory management; materials handling; productivity; risk management; work in progress; automated material handling system; buffering; capital return; capital-intensive factory; cost per storage shelf; factory productivity; inventory minimization; point-to-point delivery times; process tool utilization; transport metrics; work-in-progress; Automation; Buffer storage; Flow production systems; Fluid flow measurement; Material storage; Materials handling; Production facilities; Springs; Throughput; Time measurement;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Semiconductor Manufacturing, 2005. ISSM 2005, IEEE International Symposium on
  • Print_ISBN
    0-7803-9143-8
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/ISSM.2005.1513356
  • Filename
    1513356