DocumentCode
2092309
Title
Notice of Retraction
Comparative Analysis of Biomass Power Generation Technologies
Author
Xutao Wang ; Jing Wang ; Xingtao Zhao ; Peiyuan Zhang
Author_Institution
Henan Univ. of Urban Constr., Pingdingshan, China
fYear
2010
fDate
28-31 March 2010
Firstpage
1
Lastpage
3
Abstract
Notice of Retraction
After careful and considered review of the content of this paper by a duly constituted expert committee, this paper has been found to be in violation of IEEE´s Publication Principles.
We hereby retract the content of this paper. Reasonable effort should be made to remove all past references to this paper.
The presenting author of this paper has the option to appeal this decision by contacting TPII@ieee.org.
The world pays more attention to biomass (straw) power generation due to its good power quality, friendly environment and less pollution. The paper analyzed the characteristic of the three categories biomass power generation, further more the comparative analysis of its economic and application scope were carried out. It shows that the economics of biomass co-combustion power generation technology was the best one, direct-fired power generation technology has a high efficiency and the unit investment and it is more reasonable when it is in scale operation; gasification power generation technology has the virtue of less investment, low generation cost and good flexibility; the investment cost of co-combustion power generation technology is less, this system has a higher efficiency.
After careful and considered review of the content of this paper by a duly constituted expert committee, this paper has been found to be in violation of IEEE´s Publication Principles.
We hereby retract the content of this paper. Reasonable effort should be made to remove all past references to this paper.
The presenting author of this paper has the option to appeal this decision by contacting TPII@ieee.org.
The world pays more attention to biomass (straw) power generation due to its good power quality, friendly environment and less pollution. The paper analyzed the characteristic of the three categories biomass power generation, further more the comparative analysis of its economic and application scope were carried out. It shows that the economics of biomass co-combustion power generation technology was the best one, direct-fired power generation technology has a high efficiency and the unit investment and it is more reasonable when it is in scale operation; gasification power generation technology has the virtue of less investment, low generation cost and good flexibility; the investment cost of co-combustion power generation technology is less, this system has a higher efficiency.
Keywords
bioenergy conversion; fuel gasification; investment; power supply quality; biomass co-combustion power generation technology; comparative analysis; direct-fired power generation technology; economic application; gasification power generation technology; generation cost; investment; power quality; unit investment; Biological materials; Biomass; Boilers; Fluidization; Internal combustion engines; Investments; Pollution; Power generation; Power generation economics; Turbines;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Power and Energy Engineering Conference (APPEEC), 2010 Asia-Pacific
Conference_Location
Chengdu
Print_ISBN
978-1-4244-4812-8
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/APPEEC.2010.5448386
Filename
5448386
Link To Document