• DocumentCode
    2098944
  • Title

    Comparison of stochastic response surface method and Monte Carlo method for uncertainty analysis of electronics prognostics

  • Author

    Pan, Wuyang ; Wang, Zili ; Sun, Bo

  • Author_Institution
    School of Reliability and Systems Engineering Beihang University, Beijing, China
  • fYear
    2015
  • fDate
    22-25 June 2015
  • Firstpage
    1
  • Lastpage
    7
  • Abstract
    The uncertainties in prognostics have an effect on the applicability of prognostics methods, and the quality and the degree of trustiness of prognostics results. Monte Carlo method is the most common method for uncertainty analysis. But it is a time-consuming method and the simulation time consumed improves as the sampling times improve. This will cost a large amount of computing sources. In this paper, the prognostics uncertainty analysis method based on stochastic response surface method (SRSM) has been proposed. In the case study of the board-level electronic product prognostics of a strain tester, the second order SRSM is selected for uncertainty analysis. The comparison shows that the prognostics result based on the SRSM of 27 times simulation is close to the result based on the Monte Carlo method of 100,000 times simulation. It verifies the rapid convergence and effectiveness of the SRSM for the prognostics uncertainty analysis.
  • Keywords
    Failure analysis; Fatigue; Monte Carlo methods; Polynomials; Response surface methodology; Sensitivity analysis; Uncertainty; Monte-Carlo(MC); Stochastic Response Surface Method (SRSM); prognostics; uncertainty analysis;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Prognostics and Health Management (PHM), 2015 IEEE Conference on
  • Conference_Location
    Austin, TX, USA
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/ICPHM.2015.7245068
  • Filename
    7245068