• DocumentCode
    2100486
  • Title

    Comprehensive imager simulation for improved acoustic power control

  • Author

    Daft, Chris M W ; Leue, William M. ; Thomenius, Kai E. ; Macdonald, Michael C. ; Odegaard, Lars A.

  • Author_Institution
    GE Corporate R&D, Schenectady, NY, USA
  • Volume
    2
  • fYear
    1999
  • fDate
    1999
  • Firstpage
    1571
  • Abstract
    Commercial ultrasound imagers must comply with the FDA 510(k) regulations to be marketed in the USA. Controlling the acoustic output to meet these requirements is complex. There are hundreds of thousands of discrete operating conditions available to the sonographer. Accurate measurements require “peaking” of the hydrophone in azimuth and elevation, and acquiring data as a function of range. The acoustic field needs to be characterized in 3 dimensions. It is impossible to measure the imager´s output under each condition, so algorithmic means are needed to reduce the size of the problem. Even when simple linear dependencies (such as pulse repetition frequency) are taken into account, the time to obtain Thermal and Mechanical Indices for a new probe is formidable. One also must repeat the experiment each time changes are made to the transmitter hardware, or its waveforms. The authors present further results on how to speed the acquisition of data used for estimation of the output labeling parameters by guiding the water-tank measurements with a beam simulator. The linear simulation uses the FIELD II code from the Technical University of Denmark. The advantages and limitations of such an approach are detailed with reference to bracketing the maximum power search range. The authors also give an assessment of the reliability of the simulated values in view of nonlinear ultrasound propagation. Nonlinear effects are especially difficult to simulate since water offers little attenuation to the harmonics generated during propagation. Quite frequently, this nonlinearity is sufficient to redistribute the peak positions of the various acoustic intensities
  • Keywords
    acoustic variables control; biocontrol; biomedical equipment; biomedical ultrasonics; hydrophones; FDA 510(k) regulations; US probe; algorithmic means; commercial ultrasound imagers; comprehensive imager simulation; discrete operating conditions; hydrophone peaking; improved acoustic power control; mechanical indices; medical diagnostic imaging; medical instrumentation; pulse repetition frequency; simple linear dependencies; sonographer; thermal indices; Acoustic measurements; Acoustic propagation; Acoustic pulses; Azimuth; Frequency; Power control; Size measurement; Sonar equipment; Ultrasonic imaging; Ultrasonic variables measurement;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Ultrasonics Symposium, 1999. Proceedings. 1999 IEEE
  • Conference_Location
    Caesars Tahoe, NV
  • ISSN
    1051-0117
  • Print_ISBN
    0-7803-5722-1
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/ULTSYM.1999.849295
  • Filename
    849295