• DocumentCode
    2112581
  • Title

    Performance comparison of robust laser interferometer (RLI) and contact accelerometer technology in aviation health monitoring

  • Author

    Goodenow, Theodore ; Karchnak, Martin ; Shipman, Robert

  • Volume
    6
  • fYear
    2004
  • fDate
    6-13 March 2004
  • Firstpage
    3663
  • Abstract
    Accelerometer systems are commonly employed in aviation health and usage monitoring systems (HUMS) and other aviation diagnostic and prognostic system approaches. Over the past decade, an research and development (R&D) robust laser interferometer (RLI) has been employed in a variety of aviation component health measurement situations, and in a variety of functional measurement situations of potential significance for aviation system health. Examples of RLI measurement data are taken from gearbox and turbine jet engine test cell measurements and from laboratory measurements that involve both controlled and empirical experiments. Selected simulation data is also used to validate aspects of the differences in performance that are anticipated when comparing both a quality contact (accelerometer) system implementation and the non-contact (RLI) measurement system. Dynamic and environmental parameters of concern were selected from an article by Jon Wilson in Sensor Magazine (March 1999) entitled "Dynamic and Environmental Effects on Performance Parameters". The dynamic parameters include: sensitivity/signal-to-noise; dynamic range; amplitude frequency response; phase frequency response; amplitude non-linearity; transverse sensitivity; and mass and size. The environmental parameters include: temperature; thermal transmit sensitivity; base strain sensitivity; electromagnetic sensitivity; acoustic sensitivity; radioactive environments; humidity; grounding/electrical isolation; and placebo/noise monitor control. Additionally, other factors are addressed including bandpass differences in terms of total bandpass, high frequency performance and low frequency performance. Observations are also included that address potential user interest beyond performance. Examples include implementation alternatives, integration considerations, cost considerations and an outline of the remaining work that need to be accomplished for introducing a new generation of "advanced health and usage monitoring systems".
  • Keywords
    accelerometers; aerospace simulation; condition monitoring; frequency measurement; frequency response; gears; light interferometers; measurement by laser beam; monitoring; sensitivity; R&D; acoustic sensitivity; advanced health monitoring systems; aircraft simulation; amplitude frequency response; amplitude nonlinearity; aviation component health measurement; aviation diagnostic system; aviation health and usage monitoring systems; aviation system health; bandpass differences; base strain sensitivity; contact accelerometer systems; electromagnetic sensitivity; frequency performance; functional measurement; gearbox; grounding-electrical isolation; humidity; laboratory measurements; noncontact measurement system; phase frequency response; placebo-noise monitor control; prognostic system; quality contact system; radioactive environments; research and development; robust laser interferometer; signal-to-noise ratio; thermal transmit sensitivity; transverse sensitivity; turbine jet engine test cell; Accelerometers; Frequency response; Jet engines; Laboratories; Monitoring; Nonlinear dynamical systems; Research and development; Robustness; Testing; Turbines;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Aerospace Conference, 2004. Proceedings. 2004 IEEE
  • ISSN
    1095-323X
  • Print_ISBN
    0-7803-8155-6
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/AERO.2004.1368183
  • Filename
    1368183