DocumentCode
2181266
Title
Automating the constraining process
Author
Luna, Joel J.
Author_Institution
Dynamics Res. Corp., Chelmsford, MA, USA
fYear
2008
fDate
7-10 Dec. 2008
Firstpage
1194
Lastpage
1199
Abstract
The typical approach to finding minimum levels of resources that still allow support and operational performance goals to be met for military aircraft is based on a manual trial-and-error method. This is because the function to be minimized (total manpower levels) is an input, and constraints (in terms of support and operational goals) are outputs. An approach with algorithms for automating this optimization, called constraining, is presented, based on dividing the range of total manpower into partitions and then searching for the lowest partition that still returns a manpower allocation that meets the performance goals. A tool, which was developed implementing this approach, is also discussed and results are presented. The conclusion is that while analysts are surprisingly good at finding minimum levels of resources, an automated approach produces acceptable results which are also reproducible and reduce analyst workload.
Keywords
human resource management; military aircraft; constraining process; manpower allocation; manual trial-and-error method; military aircraft; total manpower level; Constraint optimization; Costs; Difference equations; Discrete event simulation; Logistics; Maintenance; Manuals; Military aircraft; Partitioning algorithms; Performance analysis;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Simulation Conference, 2008. WSC 2008. Winter
Conference_Location
Austin, TX
Print_ISBN
978-1-4244-2707-9
Electronic_ISBN
978-1-4244-2708-6
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/WSC.2008.4736190
Filename
4736190
Link To Document