• DocumentCode
    2181266
  • Title

    Automating the constraining process

  • Author

    Luna, Joel J.

  • Author_Institution
    Dynamics Res. Corp., Chelmsford, MA, USA
  • fYear
    2008
  • fDate
    7-10 Dec. 2008
  • Firstpage
    1194
  • Lastpage
    1199
  • Abstract
    The typical approach to finding minimum levels of resources that still allow support and operational performance goals to be met for military aircraft is based on a manual trial-and-error method. This is because the function to be minimized (total manpower levels) is an input, and constraints (in terms of support and operational goals) are outputs. An approach with algorithms for automating this optimization, called constraining, is presented, based on dividing the range of total manpower into partitions and then searching for the lowest partition that still returns a manpower allocation that meets the performance goals. A tool, which was developed implementing this approach, is also discussed and results are presented. The conclusion is that while analysts are surprisingly good at finding minimum levels of resources, an automated approach produces acceptable results which are also reproducible and reduce analyst workload.
  • Keywords
    human resource management; military aircraft; constraining process; manpower allocation; manual trial-and-error method; military aircraft; total manpower level; Constraint optimization; Costs; Difference equations; Discrete event simulation; Logistics; Maintenance; Manuals; Military aircraft; Partitioning algorithms; Performance analysis;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Simulation Conference, 2008. WSC 2008. Winter
  • Conference_Location
    Austin, TX
  • Print_ISBN
    978-1-4244-2707-9
  • Electronic_ISBN
    978-1-4244-2708-6
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/WSC.2008.4736190
  • Filename
    4736190