• DocumentCode
    2193341
  • Title

    Factors affecting flat panel PMT calibration for gamma ray imaging

  • Author

    Pani, R. ; Pellegrini, R. ; Cinti, M.N. ; Trotta, C. ; Trotta, G. ; Scafè, R. ; D´Addio, L. ; Iurlaro, G. ; Montani, L. ; Bennati, P. ; Ridolfi, S. ; Cusanno, F. ; Garibaldi, F.

  • Author_Institution
    Dept. of Exp. Medicine & Pathology, Rome Univ., Italy
  • Volume
    2
  • fYear
    2002
  • fDate
    10-16 Nov. 2002
  • Firstpage
    671
  • Abstract
    Hamamatsu H8500 Flat Panel PMT represents the last technological advancement in gamma ray imaging. Compact size makes it attractive for medical imaging application. To study and compare image performance two Flat Panel PMTs were coupled to CsI(Tl) and NaI(Tl) scintillation arrays with 3 mm and 1.8 mm pixel size respectively and they were connected to multi-anode electronic readout (64 channel). Furthermore a pulsed blue LED coupled to an optical fiber was utilized to scan the tube with different light distribution spreading. The study took into account how PMT anode gain uniformity response, light distribution and intensity, influence spatial resolution, position linearity and image noise. Gain calibration was firstly studied because of PMT gain anode non uniformity response, which range between 27:100 and between 45:100 respectively. Furthermore each crystal pixel produces different charge distribution and this depends on the matching between anode and scintillation array lattice. The amount of anode charge can change more than a factor five for narrow light distributions. Tube gain setting results critical, in fact because of energy resolution of each anode spectra, only a factor five pulse height variation can be adequately converted by ADC. In addition there is a further gain anode variation due to PMT non uniformity response of a factor 3. This mentioned two elements, do not allow to convert all pulses in the useful pulse height ADC range. As a consequence image position distortion and background are produced. Flat Panel shows good image performance. However, because of the big anode size and PMT gain non uniformity response, the gain setting can be critical to obtain the best image performance for scintillation light distribution comparable with anode size.
  • Keywords
    caesium compounds; calibration; gamma-ray detection; nuclear electronics; photomultipliers; position sensitive particle detectors; pulse height analysers; readout electronics; sodium compounds; solid scintillation detectors; thallium; 1.8 mm; 3 mm; CsI(Tl); Hamamatsu H8500 Flat Panel; NaI(Tl); electronic readout; flat panel PMT calibration; gain calibration; gamma ray imaging; image noise; image position distortion; light distribution; light distribution spreading; medical imaging application; optical fiber; photomultiplier tubes; position linearity; pulse height variation; pulsed blue LED; uniformity response; Anodes; Biomedical imaging; Calibration; Image converters; Light emitting diodes; Nuclear imaging; Optical coupling; Optical pulses; Performance gain; Pixel;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, 2002 IEEE
  • Print_ISBN
    0-7803-7636-6
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/NSSMIC.2002.1239413
  • Filename
    1239413