• DocumentCode
    2195802
  • Title

    Correction methods for missing data in sinograms of the HRRT PET scanner

  • Author

    De Jong, DHHugo ; Boellaard, Ronald ; Knoess, Christof ; Lenox, Mark ; Michel, Christiaan ; Casey, Mike ; Lammertsma, Adriaan

  • Author_Institution
    Med. Center, Vrije Univ., Amsterdam, Netherlands
  • Volume
    2
  • fYear
    2002
  • fDate
    10-16 Nov. 2002
  • Firstpage
    1202
  • Abstract
    The High Resolution Research Tomograph (HRRT) is a 3D PET scanner designed for brain imaging and small animal imaging. The HRRT consists of 8 panel detector heads that are separated by a gap of 17 mm resulting in data gaps in the sinogram. Furthermore, data gaps can result from detector-block failure. To prevent artifacts in the reconstruction when using FORE, filling in of the data gaps is required. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of several gap filling methods. Two gap-filling methods were investigated: a) bilinear interpolation, b) a model-based method: an intermediate volume is reconstructed (2D) based on only direct planes, after which this image is forward projected towards the data gaps. In addition, an improved model-based method is introduced: c) first fill the gaps using interpolation, then reconstructing using FORE and forward projecting to fill the gaps. Detector gaps and block failures were mimicked by zeroing LORs in simulated and experimentally acquired sinograms. The gaps were filled using the different methods, reconstructed using FORE+2DOSEM and compared with reconstruction of the original sinogram. From the variance of the reconstructions and from difference images it could be concluded that for homogeneous objects which are large as compared to the extent of data gaps all methods give similar results, although the interpolation methods requires significant less computation time. For objects with dimensions comparable to the size of a data gap the interpolation method falls short. The simple model-based method however suffers from artifacts in the intermediate direct planes reconstruction. The latter is overcome by the improved model-based method. In conclusion, the improved model-based method might outperform the interpolation method, but due to the long computation times usage of this method is only justified in case of small objects.
  • Keywords
    interpolation; medical image processing; positron emission tomography; 3D PET scanner; FORE; HRRT; High Resolution Research Tomograph; bilinear interpolation; brain imaging; gap filling methods; homogeneous objects; intermediate direct planes reconstruction; intermediate volume; model-based method; small animal imaging; Animals; Brain; Detectors; Filling; Head; High-resolution imaging; Image reconstruction; Image resolution; Interpolation; Positron emission tomography;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, 2002 IEEE
  • Print_ISBN
    0-7803-7636-6
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/NSSMIC.2002.1239536
  • Filename
    1239536