• DocumentCode
    2206903
  • Title

    Performance assessment of indoor location technologies

  • Author

    Challamel, Remi ; Tomé, Phillip ; Harmer, Dave ; Beauregard, Stéphane

  • Author_Institution
    Thales Alenia Space, Colombes
  • fYear
    2008
  • fDate
    5-8 May 2008
  • Firstpage
    624
  • Lastpage
    632
  • Abstract
    Location based services (LBS) are currently enjoying a strong success as a result of well-proven GNSS positioning technology (GPS, assisted GPS). However, the future generation of LBS will have to address the challenge of accurate and reliable indoor localization. In fact, this need has already been clearly expressed by various communities of professional end users (firemen, security forces, etc.) in the context of LIAISON and WearlTork projects funded by the European community\´s sixth framework program. In order to assess the performance of the location technologies most suited to cope with the stringent constraints of indoor LBSs oriented towards the needs of professional users, in particular those of the firemen, a "location trial" composed of several test scenarios was organized, putting face to face in a common systematic reference the following positioning technologies: - Inertial MEMS coupled with GNSS, using two different algorithmic approaches for the inertial component: signal pattern recognition associated with human biomechanical walking models and conventional inertial navigation using zero velocity updates at footfalls; - UWB radio-based localization prototype system. The results from this "location trial" show that inertial technology achieves interesting performances (stand-alone positioning accuracy better than 3 meters RMS after 4 minutes and less than 6 meters RMS after 8 minutes of continuous pedestrian walk), but still lacks robustness against specific environmental conditions (in particular magnetic disturbances affecting orientation estimation) and users\´ walking behavior. As for the UWB prototype system, it provides good positioning accuracy (less than 3 meters RMS) for nominal operational conditions, but but it can experience severe degradation under certain circumstances. By highlighting the pros and cons of each technology under a common framework, this "location trial" has provided a clearer understanding how their seamless combination - - can realistically address all users\´ needs: accuracy, reliability, robustness, coverage, deployability and wearability.
  • Keywords
    Global Positioning System; inertial navigation; micromechanical devices; mobility management (mobile radio); pattern recognition; ultra wideband technology; GNSS positioning technology; GPS; UWB radio-based localization prototype system; human biomechanical walking model; indoor localization; indoor location technology; inertial MEMS; inertial component; inertial navigation; location based services; orientation estimation; performance assessment; signal pattern recognition; zero velocity update; Face; Global Positioning System; Legged locomotion; Micromechanical devices; Pattern recognition; Prototypes; Robustness; Satellite navigation systems; Security; System testing; Inertial MEMS/Assisted GPS hybridization; PDR; UWB; indoor location; performance assessment;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Position, Location and Navigation Symposium, 2008 IEEE/ION
  • Conference_Location
    Monterey, CA
  • Print_ISBN
    978-1-4244-1536-6
  • Electronic_ISBN
    978-1-4244-1537-3
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/PLANS.2008.4569982
  • Filename
    4569982