DocumentCode
2254461
Title
Three critical, must win issues for class I locations
Author
Seitz, R.L. ; Babiarz, Paul S. ; Rowe, Vince
Author_Institution
ASRC Energy Services, Anchorage, AK, USA
fYear
2003
fDate
15-17 Sept. 2003
Firstpage
53
Lastpage
58
Abstract
The trend for the petrochemical industry in the US is to still classify hazardous locations according to the Division system while Canadian users are moving rapidly to the Zone method of classification. What can be done to generate more interest in Zones in the US? One catalyst for incorporating the Zone method of classification into the North American electrical codes was to avoid the use of explosion proof seals. Despite the lack of confidence in the proper installation of seals, there is little that can be added to a quality control program to improve this situation. Efforts must, therefore, be intensified to develop a less expensive, more reliable method to install and pour scaling compound. Proper classification of unattended sites is still a challenge without more use of gas detectors and adequate ventilation.
Keywords
hazardous areas; petroleum industry; seals (stoppers); ventilation; Canada; North American electrical codes; USA; Zone method; class I locations; explosion proof seals; gas detectors; petrochemical industry; quality control program; scaling compound; unattended sites classification; ventilation; Chemical industry; Gas detectors; IEC; National electric code; North America; Petrochemicals; Quality control; Seals; USA Councils; Ventilation;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Petroleum and Chemical Industry Conference, 2003. Record of Conference Papers. IEEE Industry Applications Society 50th Annual
ISSN
0090-3507
Print_ISBN
0-7803-7956-X
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/PCICON.2003.1242598
Filename
1242598
Link To Document