Title :
Accounting for false indication in a Bayesian diagnostics framework
Author :
Sheppard, John W.
Author_Institution :
ARINC Eng. Services, Annapolis, MD, USA
Abstract :
Accounting for the effects of test uncertainty is a significant problem in test and diagnosis. Specifically, assessment of the level of uncertainty and subsequent utilization of that assessment to improve diagnostics must be addressed. One approach, based on measurement science, is to treat the probability of a false indication (false alarm or missed detection) as the measure of uncertainty. Given the ability to determine such probabilities, a Bayesian approach to diagnosis suggests itself. In the paper, we present a mathematical derivation for false indication and apply it to the specification of Bayesian diagnosis. We draw from measurement science, reliability theory, and the theory of Bayesian networks to provide an end-to-end probabilistic treatment of the fault diagnosis problem.
Keywords :
Bayes methods; automatic test equipment; automatic test software; belief networks; electronic equipment testing; fault diagnosis; measurement theory; probability; reliability theory; uncertainty handling; Bayesian diagnosis specification; Bayesian diagnostics framework; Bayesian networks theory; end-to-end probabilistic treatment; false alarm; false indication probability; fault diagnosis problem; mathematical derivation; measurement science; missed detection; reliability theory; test diagnosis; test uncertainty effects; Bayesian methods; Calibration; Circuit faults; Circuit testing; Environmental factors; Fault diagnosis; Laboratories; Measurement uncertainty; Predictive models; Reliability theory;
Conference_Titel :
AUTOTESTCON 2003. IEEE Systems Readiness Technology Conference. Proceedings
Print_ISBN :
0-7803-7837-7
DOI :
10.1109/AUTEST.2003.1243587