• DocumentCode
    2277471
  • Title

    Fast and self-consistent ASW performance prediction

  • Author

    Ainslie, M.A. ; Harrison, C.H.

  • Author_Institution
    BAeSEMA Ltd., New Malden, UK
  • Volume
    3
  • fYear
    1998
  • fDate
    28 Sep-1 Oct 1998
  • Firstpage
    1553
  • Abstract
    Traditional assessment methods for ASW (anti-submarine warfare) sonar performance involve the calculation of transmission loss (TL) vs range and the identification of intersections between TL and the appropriate figure of merit. However the figure of merit (FOM) includes an ambient noise term, which itself is a function of the same sonar and environmental parameters (frequency, array depth, water depth, sound speed profile and so on) as TL. This leads to inconsistencies if the FOM is not recalculated to take into account a change to (say) the bottom type used for the TL prediction. These inconsistencies can lead to incorrect or misleading conclusions concerning optimum values for detection frequency and array depth. For reverberation-limited active sonar the problems are greater still because the FOM (which must include a reverberation term) is then a function of target range as well
  • Keywords
    acoustic noise; military systems; sonar arrays; sonar detection; underwater vehicles; ASW sonar performance; ambient noise term; anti-submarine warfare; array depth; assessment methods; bottom type; detection frequency; fast self-consistent ASW performance prediction; figure of merit; range; reverberation-limited active sonar; transmission loss; Acoustic noise; Frequency; Noise figure; Noise level; Performance loss; Poles and towers; Propagation losses; Reverberation; Sonar detection; Working environment noise;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    OCEANS '98 Conference Proceedings
  • Conference_Location
    Nice
  • Print_ISBN
    0-7803-5045-6
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/OCEANS.1998.726332
  • Filename
    726332