DocumentCode
2277758
Title
Trading legibility against implementability in requirement specifications: an experimental assessment
Author
Jacquot, J.P. ; Valdenaire, A.
Author_Institution
CNRSCRIN-INRIA Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy, France
fYear
1995
fDate
27-29 Mar 1995
Firstpage
181
Lastpage
188
Abstract
Ideally, a requirement specification language should lead to highly readable text while being implementable. Unfortunately, current technology does not offer good support for features which enhance legibility such as elisions, flexible syntaxes, and more generally incomplete texts. GLIDER´s designers have deliberately included those features in the language, thus forbidding some texts to be processed. This study is a rigorous assessment, both qualitative and quantitative, of this decision on the first step of processing: the parsing of terms.
Keywords
formal specification; grammars; specification languages; GLIDER; elisions; experimental assessment; flexible syntaxes; formal specifications; human factor features; incomplete texts; requirement specifications; rigorous assessment; specification language; term parsing; Context; Formal languages; Formal specifications; Humans; Software design; Software engineering; Specification languages; Typesetting; Usability; Writing;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Requirements Engineering, 1995., Proceedings of the Second IEEE International Symposium on
Print_ISBN
0-8186-7017-7
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/ISRE.1995.512560
Filename
512560
Link To Document