• DocumentCode
    229652
  • Title

    Value justification and conscience in professional activities: A case study about scientists, technologists and engineers

  • Author

    Zhaoming Gao ; Meizhen Dong

  • Author_Institution
    Philos. Dept., Nanjing Normal Univ., Nanjing, China
  • fYear
    2014
  • fDate
    23-24 May 2014
  • Firstpage
    1
  • Lastpage
    4
  • Abstract
    Scientific reasons, practical reasons and profession obligations usually provide three basic value justifications in engineering practice. These justifications are necessary, but not sufficient. In engineering practice, the value justification in the professional activities of scientists, technologists and engineers should be based on “good” out of “true” and “utility.” When facing with the conflicts between multi-obligations and responsibilities, first of all a value priority order should be set up as far as possible and corresponding choice be made. If it is hard to give an explicit value hierarchy, then judging and weighing should be considered. If value conflicts come from multi-cultural encountering, then each encountered culture should be respected. Conscience is the “goalkeeper” if nothing works out, and it is the inner voice and conscience that should be listened to and obeyed for it is the last resort for value decision.
  • Keywords
    professional aspects; engineering practice; practical reason; profession obligations; professional activities; scientific reason; value justification; value priority order; Educational institutions; Ethics; Indexes; Presses; Standards; Technological innovation; conscience; engineering practice; practical reason; professional activities; professional norms; scientific reason; value justification;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Ethics in Science, Technology and Engineering, 2014 IEEE International Symposium on
  • Conference_Location
    Chicago, IL
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/ETHICS.2014.6893452
  • Filename
    6893452