DocumentCode :
2347210
Title :
Semantic Criteria for Choosing a Language for Big-Step Models
Author :
Esmaeilsabzali, Shahram ; Day, Nancy A. ; Atlee, Joanne M. ; Niu, Jianwei
Author_Institution :
Cheriton Sch. of Comput. Sci., Univ. of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
fYear :
2009
fDate :
Aug. 31 2009-Sept. 4 2009
Firstpage :
181
Lastpage :
190
Abstract :
With the popularity of model-driven methodologies, and the abundance of modelling languages, a major question for a requirements engineer is: which language is suitable for modelling a system under study? We address this question from a semantic point-of-view for big-step modelling languages (BSMLs). BSMLs are a class of popular behavioural modelling languages in which a model can respond to an input by executing multiple, possibly concurrent, transitions. We deconstruct the operational semantics of a large class of BSMLs into high-level, orthogonal semantic aspects, and analyze the relative advantages and disadvantages of the common semantic options for each of these aspects. Our goal is to empower a requirements engineer to compare and choose an appropriate BSML.
Keywords :
computational linguistics; formal specification; program diagnostics; specification languages; behavioural modelling language; big-step model; model-driven methodology; operational semantic criteria; requirements engineer; Computer science; Domain specific languages; Unified modeling language; Writing; Semantics of modelling languages; Statecharts; Synchronous languages; UML statemachines; big-step modelling languages; interactive systems; reactive systems;
fLanguage :
English
Publisher :
ieee
Conference_Titel :
Requirements Engineering Conference, 2009. RE '09. 17th IEEE International
Conference_Location :
Atlanta, GA
ISSN :
1090-705X
Print_ISBN :
978-0-7695-3761-0
Type :
conf
DOI :
10.1109/RE.2009.29
Filename :
5328553
Link To Document :
بازگشت