• DocumentCode
    2374096
  • Title

    ARQ versus Rateless Coding: From a point of view of redundancy

  • Author

    Wang, Xijun ; Chen, Wei ; Cao, Zhigang

  • Author_Institution
    Dept. of Electron. Eng., Tsinghua Univ., Beijing, China
  • fYear
    2012
  • fDate
    10-15 June 2012
  • Firstpage
    3931
  • Lastpage
    3935
  • Abstract
    Automatic Repeat reQuest (ARQ) and Rateless Coding (RC) are two major feedback-based error control schemes. However, due to the lack of common metrics for measuring the performance, ARQ and RC have not been systematically compared yet. In this paper, we establish a unified analytical framework based on two novel metrics, namely forward redundancy and feedback redundancy, and present a comparative study on ARQ and RC from the point of view of redundancy. In particular, we conduct a fair comparison of both schemes over point-to-point fading channels and broadcast fading channels. The comparison indicates that RC is capable of beating ARQ completely at low signal-to-noise ratios in broadcast communications. In other cases, neither of them could dominate the other. Therefore, we propose a selection method to determine which scheme to employ with given system parameters.
  • Keywords
    automatic repeat request; broadcast communication; encoding; fading channels; ARQ; automatic repeat request; broadcast communications; broadcast fading channels; fading channels; point of view; rateless coding; redundancy; signal-to-noise ratios; system parameters; unified analytical framework; Automatic repeat request; Cost function; Encoding; Fading; Receivers; Redundancy; Transmitters;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Communications (ICC), 2012 IEEE International Conference on
  • Conference_Location
    Ottawa, ON
  • ISSN
    1550-3607
  • Print_ISBN
    978-1-4577-2052-9
  • Electronic_ISBN
    1550-3607
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/ICC.2012.6364208
  • Filename
    6364208