Title :
TASER conducted electrical weapons and implanted pacemakers and defibrillators
Author :
Vanga, Subba R. ; Bommana, Sudharani ; Kroll, Mark W. ; Swerdlow, Charles ; Lakkireddy, Dhanunjaya
Author_Institution :
Univ. of Kansas Hosp., Kansas City, KS, USA
Abstract :
Introduction: Conducted electrical weapons (CEW) have generated controversy in recent years regarding their effect on heart rhythm and on their suspected interaction with implanted devices such as the pacemakers and ICDs (implantable cardioverter defibrillators). We review the current evidence available on device interactions and pre-sent a new case series of 6 patients. Literature: We used the available case reports and animal studies on TASER or CEW related publications in PubMed. Conclusion: Oversensing of TASER CEW discharges may cause noise reversion pacing in pacemakers and inappropriate detection of VF in ICDs. The nominal 5-second discharge is sufficiently short that neither clinically significant inhibition of bradycardia pacing nor inappropriate ICD shocks have been reported. Current evidence indicates that CEW discharges do not have adverse effects on pacemakers and ICDs.
Keywords :
bioelectric phenomena; cardiology; defibrillators; electric shocks; medical signal detection; pacemakers; weapons; CEW discharges; TASER; bradycardia pacing; conducted electrical weapons; heart rhythm; implantable cardioverter defibrillators; implanted pacemakers; inappropriate ICD shocks; noise reversion pacing; CEW; TASER; electrophysiology; pacemakers and ICDs; Adult; Animals; Defibrillators; Electric Stimulation; Electrophysiology; Electroshock; Equipment Design; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Muscle Contraction; Muscle, Skeletal; Pacemaker, Artificial; Swine; Weapons;
Conference_Titel :
Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2009. EMBC 2009. Annual International Conference of the IEEE
Conference_Location :
Minneapolis, MN
Print_ISBN :
978-1-4244-3296-7
Electronic_ISBN :
1557-170X
DOI :
10.1109/IEMBS.2009.5333136