Author_Institution :
Lab. of Neuro Imaging, Univ. of California, Los Angeles, CA
Abstract :
The notion of using context information for solving high-level vision problems has been increasingly realized in the field. However, how to learn an effective and efficient context model, together with the image appearance, remains mostly unknown. The current literature using Markov random fields (MRFs) and conditional random fields (CRFs) often involves specific algorithm design, in which the modeling and computing stages are studied in isolation. In this paper, we propose an auto-context algorithm. Given a set of training images and their corresponding label maps, we first learn a classifier on local image patches. The discriminative probability (or classification confidence) maps by the learned classifier are then used as context information, in addition to the original image patches, to train a new classifier. The algorithm then iterates to approach the ground truth. Auto-context learns an integrated low-level and context model, and is very general and easy to implement. Under nearly the identical parameter setting in the training, we apply the algorithm on three challenging vision applications: object segmentation, human body configuration, and scene region labeling. It typically takes about 30 ~ 70 seconds to run the algorithm in testing. Moreover, the scope of the proposed algorithm goes beyond high-level vision. It has the potential to be used for a wide variety of problems of multi-variate labeling.
Keywords :
Markov processes; computer vision; image classification; image segmentation; Markov random fields; autocontext algorithm; conditional random fields; context information; high-level vision problems; high-level vision tasks; human body configuration; integrated low-level-context model; local image patches; multivariate labeling; object segmentation; scene region labeling; training images; Algorithm design and analysis; Biological system modeling; Context modeling; Hidden Markov models; Labeling; Layout; Markov random fields; Neuroimaging; Shape; Statistics;