DocumentCode :
2398430
Title :
Randomizing survey question order vs. grouping questions by construct: an empirical test of the impact on apparent reliabilities and links to related constructs
Author :
Goodhue, Dale L. ; Loiacono, Eleanor T.
Author_Institution :
Georgia Univ., Athens, GA, USA
fYear :
2002
fDate :
7-10 Jan. 2002
Firstpage :
3456
Lastpage :
3465
Abstract :
There has been a quiet debate about the proper way to design a questionnaire when multiple questions measure each construct. Two general arguments favor intermixing the questions randomly with those of other constructs; one argument favors grouping together questions that measure a single construct. This study tests these arguments using two different versions of a Web quality instrument. One version has questions grouped and labeled, and the other has questions randomly intermixed. Six hundred and three undergraduate students filled out questionnaires, half in each condition. Several different analyses suggest that the grouped question treatment has higher calculated Cronbach´s alpha reliabilities than intermixed questions, but is actually less reliable.
Keywords :
human factors; information resources; psychology; research and development management; user interfaces; Cronbach alpha reliabilities; Web quality instrument; empirical test; grouped labeled questions; grouped question treatment; multiple questions; questionnaire design; randomly intermixed. questions; survey question order randomization; undergraduate students; Clouds; Context modeling; Information technology; Instruments; Internet; Performance evaluation; System testing; Teeth;
fLanguage :
English
Publisher :
ieee
Conference_Titel :
System Sciences, 2002. HICSS. Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on
Print_ISBN :
0-7695-1435-9
Type :
conf
DOI :
10.1109/HICSS.2002.994385
Filename :
994385
Link To Document :
بازگشت