DocumentCode
239918
Title
Infographics: Horrid chartjunk or quality communication
Author
Albers, Michael J.
Author_Institution
East Carolina Univ., Greenville, SC, USA
fYear
2014
fDate
13-15 Oct. 2014
Firstpage
1
Lastpage
4
Abstract
Infographics continually appear across a wide span of websites. Design teams have embraced the trend toward infographics, but often misuse them by focusing on visual presentation rather than presenting information appropriate for the audience and content. The results are artful infographics that lack a clear audience or message. In addition, many of the infographic design guidelines seem to be based on posters. An analysis of a collection of infographics found they can be divided into four categories: bullet list equivalent, snapshot with graphic needs, flat information with graphic needs, and information flow/process. Only last three are appropriate for infographics. Several areas needing further research are identified: (1) how people comprehend the infographic and how they connect that understanding into the bigger picture, (2) better guidelines on when/how to create infographics, and (3) how to craft the content into an integrated presentation with text and graphics supporting each other.
Keywords
Web design; computer graphics; content management; Websites; artful infographics; bullet list equivalent; flat information; graphic needs; graphics presentation; infographic design guidelines; infographics creation; information flow; information presentation; information process; quality communication; text presentation; visual presentation; Educational institutions; Guidelines; Market research; Testing; Usability; Visualization; Complex information; Comprehension; Infographics; User experience;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Professional Communication Conference (IPCC), 2014 IEEE International
Conference_Location
Pittsburgh, PA
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/IPCC.2014.7020344
Filename
7020344
Link To Document