DocumentCode :
240897
Title :
Evaluating Software Safety Standards: A Systematic Review and Comparison
Author :
Wong, W. Eric ; Gidvani, Tej ; Lopez, A. ; Ruizhi Gao ; Horn, Martin
Author_Institution :
Dept. of Comput. Sci., Univ. of Texas at Dallas, Dallas, TX, USA
fYear :
2014
fDate :
June 30 2014-July 2 2014
Firstpage :
78
Lastpage :
87
Abstract :
Software safety standards are commonly used to guide the development of safety-critical software systems. However, given the existence of multiple competing standards, it is critical to select the most appropriate one for a given project. We have developed a set of 15 criteria to evaluate each standard in terms of its usage, strengths, and limitations. Five standards are studied, including a NASA Software Safety Standard, an FAA System Safety Handbook, MIL-STD-882D (US Department of Defense), DEF-STAN 00-56 (UK Ministry of Defense), and DO-178B (Commercial avionics). Results of our evaluation suggest that different standards score differently with respect to each evaluation criterion. No standard performs better than others on all the criteria. The lessons learned from software-related accidents in which the standards were involved provide further insights on the pros and cons of using each standard.
Keywords :
safety-critical software; security of data; software standards; DEF-STAN 00-56; DO-178B; FAA system safety handbook; MIL-STD-882D; NASA software safety standard; UK Ministry of Defense; US Department of Defense; commercial avionics; evaluation criterion; safety-critical software system; software safety standards; software-related accidents; FAA; Hazards; NASA; Software safety; Standards; hazards; mishap; safety standard; safety-critical software; software safety; system safety;
fLanguage :
English
Publisher :
ieee
Conference_Titel :
Software Security and Reliability-Companion (SERE-C), 2014 IEEE Eighth International Conference on
Conference_Location :
San Francisco, CA
Type :
conf
DOI :
10.1109/SERE-C.2014.25
Filename :
6901644
Link To Document :
بازگشت