DocumentCode
2427773
Title
Analysis of alternative energy sources for the united states Roadway Transportation System
Author
Irdmousa, Mehran Z. ; Singh, Pamela ; Seraj, Mohammad ; Abideen, Zain-Ul
Author_Institution
Syst. Eng. & Oper. Res. Dept., George Mason Univ., Fairfax, VA, USA
fYear
2010
fDate
23-23 April 2010
Firstpage
46
Lastpage
50
Abstract
Over the last decade, the U.S. transportation industry has produced approximately 60% of overall U.S. CO2 emissions according to the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT). A greener fuel alternative for the transportation system is needed to reduce energy-related emissions and to aid in the overall decrease in the consumption of fossil fuels. The system to be analyzed is defined as the Roadway Transportation System (RTS) of the United States. This project aims to rank six alternative fuels against several objectives for the next 30 years. These objectives include minimizing emissions and risk, while maximizing suitability and goods moved. Six alternatives are considered: gasoline, diesel, biodiesel, electric, hydrogen, and compressed natural gas (CNG) technologies. The capability and feasibility of each alternative is analyzed in accordance with satisfying all objectives. This system analysis is limited to cars, trucks, and buses. An External System Model (ESM) is developed to show the interactions of the RTS with external systems, and how those interactions map to the traceability of all objectives (1st model). To conduct this analysis, data from previous years is collected for all objectives for each alternative. Regression of this data identifies the pattern of the alternatives against the objectives over time (2nd model). Ranking of the alternatives is accomplished through Utility Evaluation (3rd model). The ranking process follows the Multi Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) process. Preliminary results show that there is uncertainty as to which alternative is best when weighed against the given objectives. However, electric and CNG rank the highest under pessimistic assumptions and electric and hydrogen rank highest under optimistic assumptions. Through analysis, all alternatives are ranked such that the objectives are satisfied over a 30 year period.
Keywords
automobile industry; biofuel; fossil fuels; petroleum; pollution control; transportation; MAUT process; United States; alternative energy sources; biodiesel; compressed natural gas; diesel; emission reduction; external system model; fossil fuel; gasoline; greener fuel alternatives; hydrogen; multiattribute utility theory; risk minimization; roadway transportation system; transportation industry; Biofuels; Data analysis; Fossil fuels; Hydrogen; Natural gas; Petroleum; Road transportation; US Department of Transportation; Uncertainty; Utility theory;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS), 2010 IEEE
Conference_Location
Charlottesville, VA
Print_ISBN
978-1-4244-7519-3
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/SIEDS.2010.5469682
Filename
5469682
Link To Document