DocumentCode :
2451255
Title :
Panel 9 - diagnostics vs failure analysis
Author :
Bartenstein, Thomas W.
Author_Institution :
Cadence Design Inc., Endicott, NY, USA
fYear :
2004
fDate :
26-28 Oct. 2004
Firstpage :
1439
Abstract :
This work discusses about the opportunity for diagnostic tools and physical failure analysis. The failure of chip, cause for the failure, and its diagnostics are also focused. The diagnostic tools attempt to isolate the cause for the failure to a small enough area to enable identification of the physical defect that caused the chip to fail. Diagnostic tools typically work in a logic model environment. Existing ATPG technology is used to generate a test pattern that exercises a specific net repeatedly and quickly to enable data collection by a photon emission tool. This work also discusses about the virtual failure analysis, which has the capability to identify defects on failing die without the PFA lab, through the use of inline defect data, and whatever other means are possible.
Keywords :
automatic test pattern generation; failure analysis; fault diagnosis; integrated circuit testing; logic testing; ATPG technology; chip defect identification; chip failure; data collection; diagnostic tools; inline defect data; logic model environment; photon emission tool; physical failure analysis; virtual failure analysis; Costs; Design engineering; Environmental economics; Failure analysis; Hardware; Maintenance engineering; Manufacturing; Production; Silicon; Testing;
fLanguage :
English
Publisher :
ieee
Conference_Titel :
Test Conference, 2004. Proceedings. ITC 2004. International
Print_ISBN :
0-7803-8580-2
Type :
conf
DOI :
10.1109/TEST.2004.1387447
Filename :
1387447
Link To Document :
بازگشت