DocumentCode
24536
Title
Is There a Preferred Classifier for Operational Thematic Mapping?
Author
Richards, J.A. ; Kingsbury, N.G.
Author_Institution
Res. Sch. of Eng., Australian Nat. Univ., Canberra, ACT, Australia
Volume
52
Issue
5
fYear
2014
fDate
May-14
Firstpage
2715
Lastpage
2725
Abstract
The importance of properly exploiting a classifier´s inherent geometric characteristics when developing a classification methodology is emphasized as a prerequisite to achieving near optimal performance when carrying out thematic mapping. When used properly, it is argued that the long-standing maximum likelihood approach and the more recent support vector machine can perform comparably. Both contain the flexibility to segment the spectral domain in such a manner as to match inherent class separations in the data, as do most reasonable classifiers. The choice of which classifier to use in practice is determined largely by preference and related considerations, such as ease of training, multiclass capabilities, and classification cost.
Keywords
geophysical image processing; image classification; image segmentation; maximum likelihood estimation; support vector machines; classification methodology; flexibility; inherent geometric characteristics; maximum likelihood approach; operational thematic mapping; optimal performance; spectral domain segmentation; support vector machine; Classification; maximum likelihood classifier (MLC); neural network; support vector machine (SVM); thematic mapping;
fLanguage
English
Journal_Title
Geoscience and Remote Sensing, IEEE Transactions on
Publisher
ieee
ISSN
0196-2892
Type
jour
DOI
10.1109/TGRS.2013.2264831
Filename
6553231
Link To Document