• DocumentCode
    24536
  • Title

    Is There a Preferred Classifier for Operational Thematic Mapping?

  • Author

    Richards, J.A. ; Kingsbury, N.G.

  • Author_Institution
    Res. Sch. of Eng., Australian Nat. Univ., Canberra, ACT, Australia
  • Volume
    52
  • Issue
    5
  • fYear
    2014
  • fDate
    May-14
  • Firstpage
    2715
  • Lastpage
    2725
  • Abstract
    The importance of properly exploiting a classifier´s inherent geometric characteristics when developing a classification methodology is emphasized as a prerequisite to achieving near optimal performance when carrying out thematic mapping. When used properly, it is argued that the long-standing maximum likelihood approach and the more recent support vector machine can perform comparably. Both contain the flexibility to segment the spectral domain in such a manner as to match inherent class separations in the data, as do most reasonable classifiers. The choice of which classifier to use in practice is determined largely by preference and related considerations, such as ease of training, multiclass capabilities, and classification cost.
  • Keywords
    geophysical image processing; image classification; image segmentation; maximum likelihood estimation; support vector machines; classification methodology; flexibility; inherent geometric characteristics; maximum likelihood approach; operational thematic mapping; optimal performance; spectral domain segmentation; support vector machine; Classification; maximum likelihood classifier (MLC); neural network; support vector machine (SVM); thematic mapping;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Journal_Title
    Geoscience and Remote Sensing, IEEE Transactions on
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • ISSN
    0196-2892
  • Type

    jour

  • DOI
    10.1109/TGRS.2013.2264831
  • Filename
    6553231