• DocumentCode
    2475926
  • Title

    P1A-12 Using the Phase Modulation Imposed by Tissue Inhomogeneity to Determine the Full Acoustic Near Field

  • Author

    Padden, W.E. ; Thompson, R.S. ; Macaskill, C.

  • Author_Institution
    Univ. of Sydney, Sydney
  • fYear
    2007
  • fDate
    28-31 Oct. 2007
  • Firstpage
    1282
  • Lastpage
    1285
  • Abstract
    Ultrasound is used in many different clinical contexts, and often in tissue with inclusions such as cavities, vessels or lesions. If the acoustic impedance of the medium within the inclusion is different to that of the surroundings, the propagating ultrasonic field will be altered, especially near the object´s boundaries and in the distal shadow zone. The diffractive field magnitude modulations are complicated. The corresponding phase modulations are, however, quite regular, and this observation is the basis for the method presented in this paper. The tissue objects we model are small to mid-sized compared to the ultrasound wavelength, with scaled wave number ka ~ 1-60, and the sound speed variations are lsim 10%. The acoustic field at any point can be expressed, in integral form, using the Green´s function as the kernel. The integrand also involves the unknown field inside the tissue inhomogeneity, which, in the widely used Born approximation, is replaced by the incident wave. Our results for biomedical parameters show that the field magnitude inside the object is greatly overestimated, with errors much greater than 100% for sound speed differences of more than a few percent. In this study we present a different treatment of the integrand that produces far more accurate results. We show that seeding the integrand with a better estimate of the phase modulation imposed by the tissue gives much more accurate and reliable results for the full field, both within and near the object. Only one evaluation of the scattering integral is required. We call this approach the Phase Corrected Scattering Integral (PCSI). Results are surprisingly accurate even when the tissue phase is estimated using a simple ray model. The range and accuracy of the PCSI approach is demonstrated in two dimensions using cylindrical geometry, and in three dimensions using spherical geometry. The method can be readily adapted to more complex scattering objects, such as non-circular cross sections, s- hells, nonuniform sound speed distributions and even multiple scattering objects.
  • Keywords
    Green´s function methods; acoustic field; acoustic impedance; acoustic wave scattering; approximation theory; bioacoustics; biological tissues; biomedical ultrasonics; integral equations; phase modulation; Born approximation; Green´s function; acoustic impedance inhomogeneities; acoustic near field; biomedical parameters; biomedical ultrasound; clinical contexts; complex scattering objects; diffractive field magnitude modulations; distal shadow zone; integral form expressions; integrands; kernel function; lesions; multiple scattering objects; nonuniform sound speed distributions; phase corrected scattering integral; phase modulation; scattering integrals; simple ray model; tissue inclusions; tissue inhomogeneity; tissue phase estimation; ultrasonic field propagation; Acoustic diffraction; Acoustic propagation; Acoustic scattering; Biomedical acoustics; Geometry; Impedance; Lesions; Phase estimation; Phase modulation; Ultrasonic imaging;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Ultrasonics Symposium, 2007. IEEE
  • Conference_Location
    New York, NY
  • ISSN
    1051-0117
  • Print_ISBN
    978-1-4244-1384-3
  • Electronic_ISBN
    1051-0117
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/ULTSYM.2007.322
  • Filename
    4409895