• DocumentCode
    2488113
  • Title

    Verification of The Minimum Cost Forwarding Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks

  • Author

    Henderson, William D. ; Tron, Steven

  • Author_Institution
    Sch. of Comput., Eng. & Inf. Sci., Northumbria Univ., Newcastle upon Tyne
  • fYear
    2006
  • fDate
    20-22 Sept. 2006
  • Firstpage
    194
  • Lastpage
    201
  • Abstract
    Wireless sensor networks (WSN) consist of small self-contained devices with computational, sensing and wireless communication capabilities. They allow flexible, powerful, tetherless, automated data collection and monitoring systems to be created. Anticipated applications include environmental hazard monitoring, forest fire detection, machine instrumentation, etc. Many routing protocols have been proposed to facilitate data transport from sensor nodes to a base station; few of these protocols have been formally verified or operationally deployed however. The minimum cost forwarding (MCF) routing protocol (Ye et al., 2001), has been proposed. The application of MCF is restricted to networks possessing a single sink node and multiple source nodes. However, it offers several potential advantages for sensor nodes with limited resources. The MCF protocol is the subject of the current study with a view to its implementation in a prototype sensor network. The first phase of the work, and the subject of this paper, is the formal evaluation of the MCF protocol to increase confidence its correctness and study its ability to handle node failure and other errors. As a result of formal verification using a model checking tool, UPPAAL, we confirm the soundness of the protocol during its initialisation and operational phases and have identified significant weaknesses in the published protocol concerning equal-cost minimum cost paths and node failure. In particular, we identify a flaw in the previously suggested periodic initialisation broadcast to re-establish a minimum cost field. Here we present these results and offer improvements to overcome some deficiencies. It is expected that model checking may usefully be applied in the study of other WSN protocols.
  • Keywords
    routing protocols; wireless sensor networks; UPPAAL; formal verification; minimum cost forwarding routing protocol; model checking tool; multiple source nodes; single sink node; wireless communication; wireless sensor network; Computer networks; Computerized monitoring; Condition monitoring; Costs; Fires; Hazards; Routing protocols; Wireless application protocol; Wireless communication; Wireless sensor networks;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation, 2006. ETFA '06. IEEE Conference on
  • Conference_Location
    Prague
  • Print_ISBN
    0-7803-9758-4
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/ETFA.2006.355457
  • Filename
    4178290