DocumentCode :
2494217
Title :
Comparison of Hadamard imaging and compressed sensing for low resolution hyperspectral imaging
Author :
Streeter, L. ; Burling-Claridge, G.R. ; Cree, M.J. ; Künnemeyer, R.
Author_Institution :
Dept. of Eng., Univ. of Waikato, Hamilton
fYear :
2008
fDate :
26-28 Nov. 2008
Firstpage :
1
Lastpage :
6
Abstract :
Image multiplexing is the technique of using combination patterns to measure multiple pixels with one sensor. Hyperspectral imaging is acquiring images with full spectra at each pixel. Using a single point spectrometer and light modulation we perform multiplexed hyperspectral imaging. We compare two forms of multiplexing, namely Hadamard imaging and compressed sensing, at low resolution. We show that Hadamard imaging is the more accurate and precise method. The primary benefit of compressed sensing is that generally a reduced number of acquisitions are necessary for accurate reconstruction. Reasonable reconstruction was achieved with compressed sensing. For example at approximately three fifths the number of measurements for Hadamard imaging, the SNR of compressed sensing approached that of Hadamard imaging with about 15% reconstruction error.
Keywords :
Hadamard codes; Hadamard transforms; image coding; image reconstruction; Hadamard imaging; compressed sensing; image multiplexing; image reconstruction; light modulation; low resolution hyperspectral imaging; single point spectrometer; Additive noise; Compressed sensing; Hyperspectral imaging; Hyperspectral sensors; Image reconstruction; Image resolution; Image sensors; Optical imaging; Optical noise; Pixel; Hadamard imaging; Hyperspectral imaging; compressed sensing;
fLanguage :
English
Publisher :
ieee
Conference_Titel :
Image and Vision Computing New Zealand, 2008. IVCNZ 2008. 23rd International Conference
Conference_Location :
Christchurch
Print_ISBN :
978-1-4244-3780-1
Electronic_ISBN :
978-1-4244-2583-9
Type :
conf
DOI :
10.1109/IVCNZ.2008.4762074
Filename :
4762074
Link To Document :
بازگشت