DocumentCode
2514488
Title
Single measurement testing, pros and cons
Author
Miller, James R., III
Author_Institution
US Army TDME Activity, Redstone Arsenal, AL, USA
fYear
1994
fDate
20-22 Sep 1994
Firstpage
721
Lastpage
725
Abstract
There is a school of thought that believes making a single measurement of some parameter is a proper test procedure. For reasons of speed and the large number of measurements to be made on an item, so the reasoning goes, one cannot afford to make multiple measurements, calculate the average and the variation of the readings. What are the consequences of this approach? Can one test a unit to its specifications using this approach? What are the trade-offs inherent in single measurement testing? What happens if an erratic unit is tested? An alternative testing method involves taking a few repeat values, averaging them and estimating their repeatability. The same set of questions apply. The pros and cons of these two approaches are discussed. Practical real world examples are presented
Keywords
automatic test equipment; automatic testing; electronic equipment testing; printed circuit testing; ATE; LRU; PCB testing; SRU; averaging; cons; line replaceable units; pros; repeat values; repeatability; shop replaceable units; single measurement testing; trade-offs; Aerospace testing; Automatic test equipment; Circuit testing; Educational institutions; Large-scale systems; Printed circuits; Software testing; System testing; Time measurement; Velocity measurement;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
AUTOTESTCON '94. IEEE Systems Readiness Technology Conference. 'Cost Effective Support Into the Next Century', Conference Proceedings.
Conference_Location
Anaheim, CA
Print_ISBN
0-7803-1910-9
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/AUTEST.1994.381545
Filename
381545
Link To Document