ADVANTAGES AND EXAMPLES OF RESAMPLING FOR CAD EVALUATION

Author

Samuelson, Frank W. ; Petrick, Nicholas ; Paquerault, Sophie

Author_Institution

CDRH/NIBIB Lab. for the Assessment of Med. Imaging Syst., US Food & Drug Adm., Rockville, MD

fYear

2007

fDate

12-15 April 2007

Firstpage

492

Lastpage

495

Abstract

Comparison of performance accuracy between different computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) devices is a challenging task. Anatomical structure of the patient and imaging geometry introduce many possible correlations among scores produced by a CAD. Numerous analysis methods have been designed to account for the correlations among CAD scores or the variable number of CAD marks, but usually not both. However, methods that resample by case incorporate both of these sources of variability while accounting for in-case correlations. In this paper we present some examples of the use of resampling on CAD score data

Keywords

biomedical equipment; correlation methods; mammography; medical image processing; sampling methods; CAD devices; CAD evaluation; CAD marks; CAD score data resampling; anatomical structure; computer-aided diagnosis; imaging geometry; in-case correlations; mammography; resampling; Anatomical structure; Biomedical imaging; Computer aided diagnosis; Design automation; Drugs; Geometry; Laboratories; Lesions; Statistics; Uncertainty;

fLanguage

English

Publisher

ieee

Conference_Titel

Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro, 2007. ISBI 2007. 4th IEEE International Symposium on

Conference_Location

Arlington, VA

Print_ISBN

1-4244-0672-2

Electronic_ISBN

1-4244-0672-2

Type

conf

DOI

10.1109/ISBI.2007.356896

Filename

4193330