A tight characterization of NP with 3 query PCPs

It is known that there exists a PCP characterization of NP where the verifier makes 3 queries and has a one-sided error that is bounded away from 1; and also that 2 queries do not suffice for such a characterization. Thus PCPs with 3 queries possess non-trivial verification power and motivate the task of determining the lowest error that can be achieved with a 3-query PCP. Recently, Hastad (1997) has shown a tight characterization of NP by constructing a 3-query PCP verifier with “error” arbitrarily close to 1/2. Unfortunately this verifier makes two-sided error and Hastad makes essential use of this feature. One-sided error, on the other hand, is a natural notion to associate with a proof system, since it has the desirable property that every rejected proof has a short counterexample. The question of determining the smallest error for which there exists a 3-query PCP verifier making one-sided error and accepting an NP-complete language, however, remained open. We resolve this question by showing that NP has a 3-query PCP with a one-sided error that is arbitrarily close to 1/2. This characterization is tight, i.e., the error cannot be lower. This result is in seeming contradiction with the results of Trevisan (1997) and Zwick (1998) who show that in order to recognize an NP-complete language, the error probability of a PCP verifier making 3 non-adaptive queries and having one-sided error must be at least 5/8. We get around this bottleneck by designing an adaptive 3-query PCP for NP. Our result yields the first tight analysis of an adaptive PCP; and reveals a previously unsuspected separation between the powers of adaptive and non-adaptive PCPs. Our design and analysis of adaptive PCPs can be extended to higher number of queries as well and we give an example of such a proof system with 5 queries. Our adaptive verifiers yield proof systems whose error probabilities match those of previous constructions, while also achieving one-sidedness in the error. This raises new questions about the power of adaptive PCPs, which deserve further study