• DocumentCode
    2531775
  • Title

    Industry human performance indicators comparison project

  • Author

    Kriesel, Tom

  • Author_Institution
    Institute of Nuclear Power Operations, Atlanta, Georgia, United States
  • fYear
    2007
  • fDate
    26-31 Aug. 2007
  • Firstpage
    58
  • Lastpage
    65
  • Abstract
    Many commercial nuclear power plants have attempted to compare their level of human performance with other commercial nuclear power plants. Because of differences in the way plants measure their levels of human performance, very few plants could compare themselves reliably with other plants, including plants in the same fleet. The definition of an error, an event, or a station or department level event free day reset varied widely. In March 2005 representatives of 23 plants from 12 utilities met to discuss the development of a common set of human performance indicators so plants could compare their human performance with other plants. By late 2005 a basis document was completed that defined several key human performance indicators that could be used to compare the level of human performance among plants. Throughout 2006 17 plants voluntarily provided quarterly key performance indicators as defined by the basis document to INPO. This paper describes the basis document and the operating experience from the data collection.
  • Keywords
    Anatomy; Defense industry; Frequency; Humans; Logic; Performance analysis; Power generation; Power industry; Safety; Valves;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Human Factors and Power Plants and HPRCT 13th Annual Meeting, 2007 IEEE 8th
  • Conference_Location
    Monterey, CA, USA
  • Print_ISBN
    978-1-4244-0306-6
  • Electronic_ISBN
    978-1-4244-0306-6
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/HFPP.2007.4413180
  • Filename
    4413180