DocumentCode
2537029
Title
Arguments against Individual Accounts in China´s Basic Pension System: The Comparison between Financial Defined Contribution and Notional Defined Contribution
Author
Liu, Fang ; Weng, Xiaodan
Author_Institution
Finance Sch., Shanghai Inst. of Foreign Trade, Shanghai, China
fYear
2012
fDate
12-14 Oct. 2012
Firstpage
55
Lastpage
58
Abstract
In recent years, China´s basic pension system which is the combination of social pooling and individual account has faced with problems such as empty individual accounts, low investment returns and weakness of incentive mechanism, etc. The advent of notional defined contribution provides a new thought for the reform of basic pension system in dilemma. In this paper, transaction costs, investment return and incentive mechanism between financial defined contribution and notional defined contribution are compared. The analysis shows that notional defined contribution is more feasible. The schedule for further reform which is feasible in short-term and sustainable in long-term should be decided with full consideration, sufficient argumentation and detailed measurement.
Keywords
incentive schemes; investment; pensions; social sciences; China basic pension system; financial defined contribution; incentive mechanism; investment return; low investment returns; notional defined contribution; social pooling; transaction costs; Educational institutions; Finance; Investments; Local government; Pensions; Safety; basic pension system; empty accounts; financial defined contribution; individual account; notional defined contribution;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Business Computing and Global Informatization (BCGIN), 2012 Second International Conference on
Conference_Location
Shanghai
Print_ISBN
978-1-4673-4469-2
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/BCGIN.2012.21
Filename
6382462
Link To Document