DocumentCode
2558220
Title
Applications integration: is it always desirable?
Author
Singletary, L.A.
Author_Institution
Louisiana Tech University
fYear
2004
fDate
5-8 Jan. 2004
Firstpage
265
Lastpage
273
Abstract
This paper describes a qualitative research study that surfaced practitioner interpretations (assumptions, knowledge, and expectations) of applications integration downsides. Although integration is the primary benefit of enterprise systems, like most things, integration also has a downside. However, most people agree that integration is still desirable. The challenge is to understand and manage the negative aspects of integration to minimize the adverse effects. Doing this requires an awareness of the potential problems. This paper augments past research on this subject with the results from a recent investigation of integration of applications for enterprise systems. Fifty-one people representing three stakeholder groups from four organizations were interviewed. The data revealed thirty-one unique integration downsides representing at least five dimensions. It now appears that integration is not always desirable or practical for a number of legitimate reasons. Collectively, organizations spend billions of dollars to achieve integration so it seems reasonable that understanding applications integration downsides is important to success. Yet, little is known about practitioners?? perceptions of integration that influence their decisions and actions.
Keywords
Application software; Data warehouses; Enterprise resource planning; History; Information systems; Law; Legal factors; Lenses; Middleware; Shape;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
System Sciences, 2004. Proceedings of the 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on
Conference_Location
Big Island, HI
Print_ISBN
0-7695-2056-1
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/HICSS.2004.1265632
Filename
1265632
Link To Document