DocumentCode :
2559283
Title :
Comparisons motion correction methods for PET studies
Author :
Hong, Injoon ; Burbar, Ziad ; Michel, Cotsaftis
Author_Institution :
Siemens Healthcare, Knoxville, TN, USA
fYear :
2012
fDate :
Oct. 27 2012-Nov. 3 2012
Firstpage :
3293
Lastpage :
3294
Abstract :
Motion in PET studies degrades the image quality and introduces bias which is critical for high resolution scanners such as mCT, mMR, and HRRT. There are many publications related to motion correction in PET. They consider either Rigid-body or Non Rigid-body motion and use three methods for motion correction. In this work we will describe and compare three motion correction methods. The first method performs motion correction in image space, while the second method performs motion correction in sinogram (or LOR) space and then reconstruct the motion corrected sinogram. The third method performs motion correction during the reconstruction process. Amongst the three methods, one should be selected depending on the amount of motion, the selected isotope, and the application: brain, cardiac, or whole body. In this work, three rigid body motion correction methods are compared for brain application.
Keywords :
brain; cardiology; image motion analysis; image reconstruction; image resolution; medical image processing; positron emission tomography; HRRT; PET; brain application; cardiac, application; high resolution scanners; image quality; image space; mCT; mMR; motion corrected sinogram; nonrigid-body motion; reconstruction process; rigid body motion correction methods; sinogram space; whole body application;
fLanguage :
English
Publisher :
ieee
Conference_Titel :
Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (NSS/MIC), 2012 IEEE
Conference_Location :
Anaheim, CA
ISSN :
1082-3654
Print_ISBN :
978-1-4673-2028-3
Type :
conf
DOI :
10.1109/NSSMIC.2012.6551750
Filename :
6551750
Link To Document :
بازگشت