DocumentCode
2568430
Title
Plasma decontamination of space equipment using cold atmospheric plasmas
Author
Thomas, Hubertus M. ; Shimizu, Satoshi ; Shimizu, Tetsuji ; Klämpfl, Tobias ; Zimmermann, Julia L. ; Morfill, Gregor E. ; Barczyk, Simon ; Rettberg, Petra ; Weber, Peter K.
Author_Institution
Max-Planck-Inst. fur extraterrestrische Phys., Garching, Germany
fYear
2012
fDate
8-13 July 2012
Firstpage
7E-10
Lastpage
7E-10
Abstract
Summary form only given.The search for extraterrestrial life is one of the most challenging science topics for the next decades. Space missions, like ExoMars, plan to land and search for biological remnants on planets and moons in our nearby Solar system. Planetary protection regulations defined by COSPAR prevent that during the mission biological contamination of the bodies occur through the space probes. Therefore decontamination of the probes and more general space equipment is necessary before the launch. The up-to-date accepted decontamination procedure originate from the old NASA Viking missions and use dry heat (T>;110°C for 30h) - a technology not well suited for sensitive equipment nowadays. We are investigating in a study financed by the German Space Agency* cold atmospheric plasma (CAP) as an alternative for such decontamination. It is well known that CAP can kill bacteria or spores within seconds or minutes, respectively, if the plasma is in direct contact with the treated sample. This procedure might also be quite aggressive to the treated surface materials. Therefore, we developed an afterglow CAP device specially designed for the soft treatment of space equipment. Afterglow plasma produced by a SMD device in air is transported into a “larger” treatment chamber where the samples are positioned. It could be shown that samples of different bacteria and spores, the latter defined by COSPAR as a means to show the effectiveness of the decontamination process, positioned on different materials (steel, Teflon, quartz) could be effectively inactivated. The surface materials are investigated after the plasma treatment to identify etching or deposition problems. The afterglow in the treatment chamber could even overcome obstacles (tubes of different height and diameter) which simulate more complicated structures of the relevant surfaces. Up to now, CAP looks like a quite promising alternative to decontaminate space equipment and will- be studied in greater detail in the near future. Details will be presented here.
Keywords
aerospace components; aerospace materials; antibacterial activity; decontamination; microorganisms; plasma applications; sterilisation (microbiological); surface contamination; surface treatment; COSPAR; ExoMars; SMD device; Teflon; afterglow CAP device; bacteria killing; biological contamination; cold atmospheric plasmas; decontamination procedure; planetary protection regulations; quartz; soft treatment; space equipment plasma decontamination; space probes; spore killing; steel; Biology; Decontamination; Materials; Plasmas; Probes; Space missions; Surface treatment;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Plasma Science (ICOPS), 2012 Abstracts IEEE International Conference on
Conference_Location
Edinburgh
ISSN
0730-9244
Print_ISBN
978-1-4577-2127-4
Electronic_ISBN
0730-9244
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/PLASMA.2012.6384102
Filename
6384102
Link To Document