DocumentCode
2578419
Title
A resilience-reliability crosswalk
Author
Boring, Ronald L. ; Gertman, David I.
Author_Institution
Controls & Stat. Dept., Idaho Nat. Lab., Idaho Falls, ID, USA
fYear
2010
fDate
10-12 Aug. 2010
Firstpage
129
Lastpage
134
Abstract
There has been strong interest in the new and emerging field called resilience engineering. This field has been quick to align itself with many existing safety disciplines, but it has also distanced itself from the field of human reliability analysis. To date, the discussion has been somewhat one-sided, with much discussion about the new insights afforded by resilience engineering. This paper presents an attempt to address resilience engineering from the perspective of human reliability analysis (HRA). It further, by means of example, attempts to review a misadministration example from the literature and evaluate that example in terms of resilience and HRA concepts. This paper seeks to clarify and ultimately refute the arguments that have served to divide HRA and resilience engineering by showing that the underlying analyses have complementary perspectives for the risk analyst and systems designer.
Keywords
behavioural sciences; ergonomics; human factors; reliability; safety; HRA concept; human reliability analysis; resilience engineering; resilience-reliability crosswalk; risk analyst; system designer; Catheters; Human factors; Humans; Reliability; Resilience; Safety; Training; human reliability analysis; resilience engineering;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Resilient Control Systems (ISRCS), 2010 3rd International Symposium on
Conference_Location
Idaho Falls, ID
Print_ISBN
978-1-4244-5955-1
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/ISRCS.2010.5602486
Filename
5602486
Link To Document