DocumentCode :
2578419
Title :
A resilience-reliability crosswalk
Author :
Boring, Ronald L. ; Gertman, David I.
Author_Institution :
Controls & Stat. Dept., Idaho Nat. Lab., Idaho Falls, ID, USA
fYear :
2010
fDate :
10-12 Aug. 2010
Firstpage :
129
Lastpage :
134
Abstract :
There has been strong interest in the new and emerging field called resilience engineering. This field has been quick to align itself with many existing safety disciplines, but it has also distanced itself from the field of human reliability analysis. To date, the discussion has been somewhat one-sided, with much discussion about the new insights afforded by resilience engineering. This paper presents an attempt to address resilience engineering from the perspective of human reliability analysis (HRA). It further, by means of example, attempts to review a misadministration example from the literature and evaluate that example in terms of resilience and HRA concepts. This paper seeks to clarify and ultimately refute the arguments that have served to divide HRA and resilience engineering by showing that the underlying analyses have complementary perspectives for the risk analyst and systems designer.
Keywords :
behavioural sciences; ergonomics; human factors; reliability; safety; HRA concept; human reliability analysis; resilience engineering; resilience-reliability crosswalk; risk analyst; system designer; Catheters; Human factors; Humans; Reliability; Resilience; Safety; Training; human reliability analysis; resilience engineering;
fLanguage :
English
Publisher :
ieee
Conference_Titel :
Resilient Control Systems (ISRCS), 2010 3rd International Symposium on
Conference_Location :
Idaho Falls, ID
Print_ISBN :
978-1-4244-5955-1
Type :
conf
DOI :
10.1109/ISRCS.2010.5602486
Filename :
5602486
Link To Document :
بازگشت