• DocumentCode
    2578419
  • Title

    A resilience-reliability crosswalk

  • Author

    Boring, Ronald L. ; Gertman, David I.

  • Author_Institution
    Controls & Stat. Dept., Idaho Nat. Lab., Idaho Falls, ID, USA
  • fYear
    2010
  • fDate
    10-12 Aug. 2010
  • Firstpage
    129
  • Lastpage
    134
  • Abstract
    There has been strong interest in the new and emerging field called resilience engineering. This field has been quick to align itself with many existing safety disciplines, but it has also distanced itself from the field of human reliability analysis. To date, the discussion has been somewhat one-sided, with much discussion about the new insights afforded by resilience engineering. This paper presents an attempt to address resilience engineering from the perspective of human reliability analysis (HRA). It further, by means of example, attempts to review a misadministration example from the literature and evaluate that example in terms of resilience and HRA concepts. This paper seeks to clarify and ultimately refute the arguments that have served to divide HRA and resilience engineering by showing that the underlying analyses have complementary perspectives for the risk analyst and systems designer.
  • Keywords
    behavioural sciences; ergonomics; human factors; reliability; safety; HRA concept; human reliability analysis; resilience engineering; resilience-reliability crosswalk; risk analyst; system designer; Catheters; Human factors; Humans; Reliability; Resilience; Safety; Training; human reliability analysis; resilience engineering;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Resilient Control Systems (ISRCS), 2010 3rd International Symposium on
  • Conference_Location
    Idaho Falls, ID
  • Print_ISBN
    978-1-4244-5955-1
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/ISRCS.2010.5602486
  • Filename
    5602486