DocumentCode :
258423
Title :
Trade-Off Analysis for Selective versus Brute-Force Regression Testing in FSMWeb
Author :
Andrews, Anneliese ; Hyunsook Do
Author_Institution :
Dept. of Comput. Sci., Univ. of Denver, Denver, CO, USA
fYear :
2014
fDate :
9-11 Jan. 2014
Firstpage :
184
Lastpage :
192
Abstract :
This paper provides a tradeoff framework to determine whether selective regression testing or brute force regression testing is preferable. The framework is based on classifying tests as reusable, retest able, and obsolete. It uses the FSMWeb model as the behavioral model upon which test generation is based. To illustrate how our tradeoff framework works for evaluating and choosing regression testing approaches for FSMWeb models, we use an example that has different modification scenarios in the FSMWeb model and analyze cost-benefit tradeoffs for the techniques that vary with the amount of changes and the impact of model changes. Further, we discuss practical issues to be considered when we choose regression testing techniques so that the employed technique meets the organization´s business values.
Keywords :
Internet; program testing; regression analysis; FSMWeb model; brute-force regression testing; business value organisation; cost-benefit tradeoffs; regression testing techniques; selective regression testing; trade-off analysis; Abstracts; Aggregates; Force; Modeling; Testing; Unified modeling language; Web pages; regression testing; trade-off analysis; web applications;
fLanguage :
English
Publisher :
ieee
Conference_Titel :
High-Assurance Systems Engineering (HASE), 2014 IEEE 15th International Symposium on
Conference_Location :
Miami Beach, FL
Print_ISBN :
978-1-4799-3465-2
Type :
conf
DOI :
10.1109/HASE.2014.33
Filename :
6754604
Link To Document :
بازگشت