DocumentCode :
2588685
Title :
Space shuttle fault tolerance: Analog and digital teamwork
Author :
Blair-Smith, Hugh
Author_Institution :
Down to the Metal, Dennis, MA, USA
fYear :
2009
fDate :
23-29 Oct. 2009
Abstract :
The Space Shuttle control system (including the avionics suite) was developed during the 1970s to meet stringent survivability requirements that were then extraordinary but today may serve as a standard against which modern avionics can be measured. In 30 years of service, only two major malfunctions have occurred, both due to failures far beyond the reach of fault tolerance technology: the explosion of an external fuel tank, and the destruction of a launch-damaged wing by re-entry friction. The Space Shuttle is among the earliest systems (if not the earliest) designed to a ldquoFO-FO-FSrdquo criterion, meaning that it had to Fail (fully) Operational after any one failure, then Fail Operational after any second failure (even of the same kind of unit), then Fail Safe after most kinds of third failure. The computer system had to meet this criterion using a Redundant Set of 4 computers plus a backup of the same type, which was (ostensibly!) a COTS type. Quadruple redundancy was also employed in the hydraulic actuators for elevons and rudder. Sensors were installed with quadruple, triple, or dual redundancy. For still greater fault tolerance, these three redundancies (sensors, computers, actuators) were made independent of each other so that the reliability criterion applies to each category separately. The mission rule for Shuttle flights, as distinct from the design criterion, became ldquoFO-FS,rdquo so that a mission continues intact after any one failure, but is terminated with a safe return after any second failure of the same type. To avoid an unrecoverable flat spin during the most dynamic flight phases, the overall system had to continue safe operation within 400 msec of any failure, but the decision to shut down a computer had to be made by the crew. Among the interesting problems to be solved were ldquocontrol sliveringrdquo and ldquosync holes.rdquo The first flight test (Approach and Landing only) was the proof of the pudding: when a key wire harness solder - joint was jarred loose by the Shuttle´s being popped off the back of its 747 mother ship, one of the computers ldquowent bananasrdquo (actual quote from an IBM expert).
Keywords :
aerospace control; avionics; fault tolerance; hydraulic actuators; space vehicles; avionics suite; fuel tank; hydraulic actuators; launch-damaged wing; quadruple redundancy; reentry friction; space shuttle control system; space shuttle fault tolerance; survivability requirements; Aerospace electronics; Control systems; Explosions; Fault tolerance; Measurement standards; Redundancy; Space shuttles; Space technology; Standards development; Teamwork;
fLanguage :
English
Publisher :
ieee
Conference_Titel :
Digital Avionics Systems Conference, 2009. DASC '09. IEEE/AIAA 28th
Conference_Location :
Orlando, FL
Print_ISBN :
978-1-4244-4078-8
Type :
conf
DOI :
10.1109/DASC.2009.5347450
Filename :
5347450
Link To Document :
بازگشت