A comparison of deterministic and stochastic approaches for allocating spatially dependent tasks in micro-aerial vehicle collectives

We compare our previously developed deterministic [7] and stochastic [3], [4] strategies for allocating tasks in robotic swarms1 consisting of very large populations of highly resource-constrained robots. We study our two task allocation approaches in a simulated scenario in which a collective of insect-inspired micro-aerial vehicles (MAVs) must produce a specified spatial distribution of pollination activity over a crop field. We investigate the approaches´ requirements, advantages, and disadvantages under realistic conditions of error in robot localization, navigation, and sensing in simulation. Our results show that the deterministic approach, which requires region-based robot navigation, yields higher task progress in all cases. For robots without such navigation capabilities, the stochastic approach is a feasible alternative, and its resulting task progress is less sensitive to error in localization, error in navigation, and a combination of high error in localization, navigation, and sensing.